RPC_INVALID_REQUEST and RPC_METHOD_NOT_FOUND are mapped internally to
HTTP error codes and should not be used for application-layer errors.
This commit adds commenting around those definitions to warn not to use
them for application errors.
On msvc14, int literal '-2147483648' is invalid, because '2147483648' is unsigned type and cant't apply minus operator to unsigned type.
To define the int literal correctly, use '-2147483647 - 1' formula that is also used to define INT_MIN in limits.h.
The fundrawtransaction() RPC was returning misleading or incorrect error
codes (for example RPC_INTERNAL_ERROR when funding the transaction
failed). This commit fixes those error codes:
- RPC_INTERNAL_ERROR should not be returned for application-level
errors, only for genuine internal errors such as corrupted data.
That error code has been replaced with RPC_WALLET_ERROR.
This commit also updates the test cases to explicitly test the error code.
The setban() RPC was returning misleading or incorrect error
codes (for example RPC_CLIENT_NODE_ALREADY_ADDED when an invalid IP
address was entered). This commit fixes those error codes:
- RPC_CLIENT_INVALID_IP_OR_SUBNET should be returned if the client
enters an invalid IP address or subnet.
This commit also updates the test cases to explicitly test the error code.
This commit also adds a testcase for trying to setban on an invalid subnet.
The removeprunedfunds() RPC was returning misleading or incorrect error
codes (for example RPC_INTERNAL_ERROR when the transaction was
not found in the wallet). This commit fixes those error codes:
- RPC_INTERNAL_ERROR should not be returned for application-level
errors, only for genuine internal errors such as corrupted data.
This error code has been replaced with RPC_WALLET_ERROR.
This commit also updates the test cases to explicitly test the error code.
RPCs in blockchain.cpp were returning misleading or incorrect error
codes (for example getblock() returning RPC_INTERNAL_ERROR when the
block had been pruned). This commit fixes those error codes:
- RPC_INTERNAL_ERROR should not be returned for application-level
errors, only for genuine internal errors such as corrupted data.
- RPC_METHOD_NOT_FOUND should not be returned in response to a
JSON request for an existing method.
Those error codes have been replaced with RPC_MISC_ERROR or
RPC_INVALID_PARAMETER as appropriate.
The bumpfee() RPC was returning misleading or incorrect error codes
(for example RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY when the transaction was not
BIP125 replacable). This commit fixes those error codes:
- RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY if an invalid address was provided:
- Invalid change address given
- RPC_INVALID_PARAMETER if a single (non-address/key) parameter is incorrect
- confTarget and totalFee options should not both be set.
- Invalid confTarget
- Insufficient totalFee (cannot be less than required fee)
- RPC_WALLET_ERROR for any other error
- Transaction has descendants in the wallet
- Transaction has descendants in the mempool
- Transaction has been mined, or is conflicted with a mined transaction
- Transaction is not BIP 125 replaceable
- Transaction has already been bumped
- Transaction contains inputs that don't belong to the wallet
- Transaction has multiple change outputs
- Transaction does not have a change output
- Fee is higher than maxTxFee
- New fee rate is less than the minimum fee rate
- Change output is too small.
This commit also updates the test cases to explicitly test the error code.
On msvc14, the compiler error C4146 (unary minus operator applied to unsigned type, result still unsigned) had been occured.
Use '0 - x' styled formula instead of '-x' so as to fix the error.
`u_int` is not available on some platforms (not sure what standard it's
supposed to be part of), we don't use it anywhere else, and it doesn't
hurt to simply write `unsigned int` out here.
Define MSG_DONTWAIT and MSG_NO_SIGNAL in the implementation files that
use them (`net.cpp` and `netbase.cpp`), instead of compat.h which is
included all over the place.
This avoids putting them in the global namespace, as defining them as 0
is a hack that works for our specific usage, but it is not a general
solution.
Also makes sure they are defined only once so the `!defined(MSG_x)` guard can go.
Instead of the WIN32-specific workaround, detect lack of `MSG_DONTWAIT`
in the build system. This allows other platforms without `MSG_DONTWAIT`
to work too.
Setting minrelaytxfee to 0 will allow all transactions regardless of fee to enter your mempool until it reaches its size limit. However now that mempool limiting is governed by a separate incrementalrelay fee, it is an unnecessary restriction to prevent a minrelaytxfee of 0.
This a breaking API change to the prioritisetransaction RPC call which previously required exactly three arguments and now requires exactly two (hash and feeDelta). The function prioritiseTransaction is also updated.
"startingpriority" and "currentpriority" are no longer returned in the JSON information about a mempool entry. This affects getmempoolancestors, getmempooldescendants, getmempooolentry, and getrawmempool.
Remove -limitfreerelay and always enforce minRelayTxFee in the mempool (except from disconnected blocks)
Remove -relaypriority, the option was only used for the ability to allow free transactions to be relayed regardless of their priority. Both notions no longer apply.
Previously if an existing watch only key was reimported with a new timestamp,
the new timestamp would not be saved in the key metadata, and would not be used
to update the wallet nTimeFirstKey value (which could cause rescanning to start
at the wrong point and miss transactions).
Issue was pointed out by Jonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch> in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9108#issuecomment-279715550
If InitBlockIndex fails, then it will segfault later. Same for the later
ActivateBestChain. BOOST_REQUIRE the result, so that an error will be
reported and the test case aborted.
Change ScanForWalletTransactions return value so it is possible to distinguish
scans that skip reading every block (due to the nTimeFirstKey optimization)
from scans that fail while reading the chainActive.Tip() block. Return value is
now non-null in the non-failing case.
This change doesn't affect any user-visible behavior, it is only an internal
API improvement. The only code currently using the ScanForWalletTransactions
return value is in importmulti, and importmulti always calls
ScanForWalletTransactions with a pindex pointing to the first block in
chainActive whose block time is >= (nLowestTimestamp - 7200), while
ScanForWalletTransactions would only return null without reading blocks when
pindex and every block after it had a block time < (nTimeFirstKey - 7200).
These conditions could never happen at the same time because nTimeFirstKey <=
nLowestTimestamp.
I'm planning to make a more substantial API improvement in the future (making
ScanForWalletTransactions private and exposing a higher level rescan method to
RPC code), but Matt Corallo <git@bluematt.me> pointed out this odd behavior
introduced by e2e2f4c "Return errors from importmulti if complete rescans are
not successful" yesterday, so I'm following up now to get rid of badness
introduced by that merge.
Prior to this commit pindexRescan was initialized to a chainActive.Tip().
However, the value of pindexRescan set at time of initialization was never
read before pindexRescan was being set to either chainActive.Genesis()
(case 1), FindForkInGlobalIndex(chainActive, locator) (case 2) or
chainActive.Genesis() (case 3). Thus, the initialization was redundant.
This commit a.) removes the redundant initialization and b.) simplifies
this logic so that pindexRescan is initialized to chainActive.Genesis()
(case 1 and 3), and set to FindForkInGlobalIndex(chainActive, locator)
(case 2) as needed.
In the case that the branch ...
if (itInFlight != mapBlocksInFlight.end() && itInFlight->second.first == nodeid) {
... is taken, there was prior to this commit an implicit assumption that
MarkBlockAsInFlight(...) was being called with its fifth and optional
argument (pit) being present (and non-NULL).
John Newbery