ff723da [Qt] improve minimum absolute fee option - Only display the minimum absolute fee control if CoinControl is enabled (Jonas Schnelli)
31b508a [Qt] make use of the nMinimumTotalFee (absolute) in coincontrols fee calculation (Jonas Schnelli)
80462dd [Qt] use ASYMP_UTF8 (≈) whenever we show a fee that is not absolute (Jonas Schnelli)
ecc7c82 Move fPayAtLeastCustomFee function to CC (Pieter Wuille)
ebb25f4 Limit setAskFor and retire requested entries only when a getdata returns. (Gregory Maxwell)
5029698 prevent peer flooding request queue for an inv (kazcw)
9af5f9c Move uiInterface.NotifyBlockTip signal above the core/wallet signal - This will keep getbestblockhash more in sync with blocknotify callbacks (Jonas Schnelli)
4082e46 [Qt] call GuessVerificationProgress synchronous during core signal, pass double over UI signal (Jonas Schnelli)
947d20b [Qt] reduce cs_main in getVerificationProgress() (Jonas Schnelli)
e6d50fc [Qt] update block tip (height and date) without locking cs_main, update always (each block) (Jonas Schnelli)
012fc91 NotifyBlockTip signal: switch from hash (uint256) to CBlockIndex* - also adds a boolean for indication if the tip update was happening during initial sync - emit notification also during initial sync (Jonas Schnelli)
This replaces using inv messages to announce new blocks, when a peer requests
(via the new "sendheaders" message) that blocks be announced with headers
instead of inv's.
Since headers-first was introduced, peers send getheaders messages in response
to an inv, which requires generating a block locator that is large compared to
the size of the header being requested, and requires an extra round-trip before
a reorg can be relayed. Save time by tracking headers that a peer is likely to
know about, and send a headers chain that would connect to a peer's known
headers, unless the chain would be too big, in which case we revert to sending
an inv instead.
Based off of @sipa's commit to announce all blocks in a reorg via inv,
which has been squashed into this commit.
Rebased-by: Pieter Wuille
This allows for much finer control of the transaction fees per kilobyte
as it prevent small transactions using a fee that is more appropriate
for one that is of a kilobyte.
This also allows controlling the fee per kilobyte over rpc such that:
bitcoin-cli settxfee `bitcoin-cli estimatefee 2`
would make sense, while currently it grossly fails often by a factor of x3
Wladimir J. van der Laan