Document the non-strict-DER-conformance of one test in tx_valid.json.
In a signature, it contains an ASN1 integer which isn't strict-DER conformant due to excessive 0xff padding:
0xffda47bfc776bcd269da4832626ac332adfca6dd835e8ecd83cd1ebe7d709b0e
0.16
Andreas Schildbach8 years agocommitted byWladimir J. van der Laan
["The following is f7fdd091fa6d8f5e7a8c2458f5c38faffff2d3f1406b6e4fe2c99dcc0d2d1cbb"],
["The following is f7fdd091fa6d8f5e7a8c2458f5c38faffff2d3f1406b6e4fe2c99dcc0d2d1cbb"],
["It caught a bug in the workaround for 23b397edccd3740a74adb603c9756370fafcde9bcc4483eb271ecad09a94dd63 in an overly simple implementation"],
["It caught a bug in the workaround for 23b397edccd3740a74adb603c9756370fafcde9bcc4483eb271ecad09a94dd63 in an overly simple implementation. In a signature, it contains an ASN1 integer which isn't strict-DER conformant due to being negative, which doesn't make sense in a signature. Before BIP66 activated, it was a valid signature. After it activated, it's not valid any more."],