A few "a->an" and "an->a".
"Shows, if the supplied default SOCKS5 proxy" -> "Shows if the supplied default SOCKS5 proxy". Change made on 3 occurrences.
"without fully understanding the ramification of a command" -> "without fully understanding the ramifications of a command".
Removed duplicate words such as "the the".
@ -181,5 +181,5 @@ knows what they are getting when installing the GUI package.
@@ -181,5 +181,5 @@ knows what they are getting when installing the GUI package.
As far as minor differences, I generally prefer to assign the file permissions
in the `%files` portion of an RPM spec file rather than specifying the
permissions of a file during `%install` and other minor things like that that
permissions of a file during `%install` and other minor things like that
// there is some fudging in these numbers related to the actual virtual transaction size calculation that will keep this estimate from being exact.
// usually, the result will be an overestimate within a couple of satoshis so that the confirmation dialog ends up displaying a slightly smaller fee.
// also, the witness stack size value value is a variable sized integer. usually, the number of stack items will be well under the single byte var int limit.
// also, the witness stack size value is a variable sized integer. usually, the number of stack items will be well under the single byte var int limit.
nBytes+=2;// account for the serialized marker and flag bytes
nBytes+=nQuantity;// account for the witness byte that holds the number of stack items for each input.
tr("Use up and down arrows to navigate history, and %1 to clear screen.").arg("<b>"+clsKey+"</b>")+"<br>"+
tr("Type <b>help</b> for an overview of available commands."))+
"<br><span class=\"secwarning\">"+
tr("WARNING: Scammers have been active, telling users to type commands here, stealing their wallet contents. Do not use this console without fully understanding the ramification of a command.")+
tr("WARNING: Scammers have been active, telling users to type commands here, stealing their wallet contents. Do not use this console without fully understanding the ramifications of a command.")+
"\nAttempts add or remove a IP/Subnet from the banned list.\n"
"\nAttempts to add or remove an IP/Subnet from the banned list.\n"
"\nArguments:\n"
"1. \"subnet\" (string, required) The IP/Subnet (see getpeerinfo for nodes ip) with a optional netmask (default is /32 = single ip)\n"
"2. \"command\" (string, required) 'add' to add a IP/Subnet to the list, 'remove' to remove a IP/Subnet from the list\n"
"3. \"bantime\" (numeric, optional) time in seconds how long (or until when if [absolute] is set) the ip is banned (0 or empty means using the default time of 24h which can also be overwritten by the -bantime startup argument)\n"
"4. \"absolute\" (boolean, optional) If set, the bantime must be a absolute timestamp in seconds since epoch (Jan 1 1970 GMT)\n"
"1. \"subnet\" (string, required) The IP/Subnet (see getpeerinfo for nodes IP) with an optional netmask (default is /32 = single IP)\n"
"2. \"command\" (string, required) 'add' to add an IP/Subnet to the list, 'remove' to remove an IP/Subnet from the list\n"
"3. \"bantime\" (numeric, optional) time in seconds how long (or until when if [absolute] is set) the IP is banned (0 or empty means using the default time of 24h which can also be overwritten by the -bantime startup argument)\n"
"4. \"absolute\" (boolean, optional) If set, the bantime must be an absolute timestamp in seconds since epoch (Jan 1 1970 GMT)\n"
["Finally CHECKMULTISIG removes all signatures prior to hashing the script containing those signatures. In conjunction with the SIGHASH_SINGLE bug this lets us test whether or not FindAndDelete() is actually present in scriptPubKey/redeemScript evaluation by including a signature of the digest 0x01 We can compute in advance for our pubkey, embed it it in the scriptPubKey, and then also using a normal SIGHASH_ALL signature. If FindAndDelete() wasn't run, the 'bugged' signature would still be in the hashed script, and the normal signature would fail."],
["Finally CHECKMULTISIG removes all signatures prior to hashing the script containing those signatures. In conjunction with the SIGHASH_SINGLE bug this lets us test whether or not FindAndDelete() is actually present in scriptPubKey/redeemScript evaluation by including a signature of the digest 0x01 We can compute in advance for our pubkey, embed it in the scriptPubKey, and then also using a normal SIGHASH_ALL signature. If FindAndDelete() wasn't run, the 'bugged' signature would still be in the hashed script, and the normal signature would fail."],
["Here's an example on mainnet within a P2SH redeemScript. Remarkably it's a standard transaction in <0.9"],
"\"redeemscript\": \"<script>\" , (string, optional) Allowed only if the scriptPubKey is a P2SH address or a P2SH scriptPubKey\n"
"\"pubkeys\": [\"<pubKey>\", ... ] , (array, optional) Array of strings giving pubkeys that must occur in the output or redeemscript\n"
"\"keys\": [\"<key>\", ... ] , (array, optional) Array of strings giving private keys whose corresponding public keys must occur in the output or redeemscript\n"
"\"internal\": <true> , (boolean, optional, default: false) Stating whether matching outputs should be be treated as not incoming payments\n"
"\"internal\": <true> , (boolean, optional, default: false) Stating whether matching outputs should be treated as not incoming payments\n"
"\"watchonly\": <true> , (boolean, optional, default: false) Stating whether matching outputs should be considered watched even when they're not spendable, only allowed if keys are empty\n"
"\"label\": <label> , (string, optional, default: '') Label to assign to the address (aka account name, for now), only allowed with internal=false\n"
@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ its preconditions are met, and returns appropriate errors in other cases.
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ its preconditions are met, and returns appropriate errors in other cases.
Dimitris Tsapakidis
8 years ago