|
|
|
@ -474,16 +474,16 @@ bool CTxMemPool::accept(CValidationState &state, CTransaction &tx, bool fLimitFr
@@ -474,16 +474,16 @@ bool CTxMemPool::accept(CValidationState &state, CTransaction &tx, bool fLimitFr
|
|
|
|
|
reason.c_str()); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// is it already in the memory pool?
|
|
|
|
|
uint256 userhash = tx.GetUsernameHash(); |
|
|
|
|
uint256 txhash = tx.GetHash(); |
|
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
|
LOCK(cs); |
|
|
|
|
if (mapTx.count(userhash)) |
|
|
|
|
if (mapTx.count(txhash)) |
|
|
|
|
return false; |
|
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
|
// do we already have it?
|
|
|
|
|
if( pblocktree->HaveTxIndex(userhash) && |
|
|
|
|
if( pblocktree->HaveTxIndex(tx.GetUsernameHash()) && |
|
|
|
|
// duplicate should be discarded but replacement is allowed.
|
|
|
|
|
!verifyDuplicateOrReplacementTx(tx, false, true) ) { |
|
|
|
|
return false; |
|
|
|
@ -518,25 +518,25 @@ bool CTxMemPool::accept(CValidationState &state, CTransaction &tx, bool fLimitFr
@@ -518,25 +518,25 @@ bool CTxMemPool::accept(CValidationState &state, CTransaction &tx, bool fLimitFr
|
|
|
|
|
// Store transaction in memory
|
|
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
|
LOCK(cs); |
|
|
|
|
addUnchecked(userhash, tx); // adds to mapTx
|
|
|
|
|
addUnchecked(txhash, tx); // adds to mapTx
|
|
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
///// are we sure this is ok when loading transactions or restoring block txes
|
|
|
|
|
SyncWithWallets(userhash, tx, NULL, true); |
|
|
|
|
SyncWithWallets(txhash, tx, NULL, true); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
printf("CTxMemPool::accept() : accepted %s (poolsz %"PRIszu")\n", |
|
|
|
|
userhash.ToString().c_str(), |
|
|
|
|
txhash.ToString().c_str(), |
|
|
|
|
mapTx.size()); |
|
|
|
|
return true; |
|
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool CTxMemPool::addUnchecked(const uint256& userhash, CTransaction &tx) |
|
|
|
|
bool CTxMemPool::addUnchecked(const uint256& txhash, CTransaction &tx) |
|
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
|
// Add to memory pool without checking anything. Don't call this directly,
|
|
|
|
|
// call CTxMemPool::accept to properly check the transaction first.
|
|
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
|
mapTx[userhash] = tx; |
|
|
|
|
mapTx[txhash] = tx; |
|
|
|
|
nTransactionsUpdated++; |
|
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
return true; |
|
|
|
@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ bool CTxMemPool::remove(const CTransaction &tx, bool fRecursive)
@@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ bool CTxMemPool::remove(const CTransaction &tx, bool fRecursive)
|
|
|
|
|
// Remove transaction from memory pool
|
|
|
|
|
if( !tx.IsSpamMessage() ){ |
|
|
|
|
LOCK(cs); |
|
|
|
|
uint256 hash = tx.GetUsernameHash(); |
|
|
|
|
uint256 hash = tx.GetHash(); |
|
|
|
|
if (mapTx.count(hash)) |
|
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
|
mapTx.erase(hash); |
|
|
|
@ -636,12 +636,14 @@ bool GetTransaction(const uint256 &userhash, CTransaction &txOut, uint256 &hashB
@@ -636,12 +636,14 @@ bool GetTransaction(const uint256 &userhash, CTransaction &txOut, uint256 &hashB
|
|
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
|
LOCK(cs_main); |
|
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
|
/* [MF] don't look in mempool anymore - userhash must be written to some block.
|
|
|
|
|
LOCK(mempool.cs); |
|
|
|
|
if (mempool.exists(userhash)) |
|
|
|
|
if (mempool.exists(userhash)) // and btw mempool is not indexed by userhash anymore!
|
|
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
|
txOut = mempool.lookup(userhash); |
|
|
|
|
return true; |
|
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
*/ |
|
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (fTxIndex) { |
|
|
|
@ -1740,12 +1742,10 @@ CMerkleBlock::CMerkleBlock(const CBlock& block, CBloomFilter& filter)
@@ -1740,12 +1742,10 @@ CMerkleBlock::CMerkleBlock(const CBlock& block, CBloomFilter& filter)
|
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < block.vtx.size(); i++) |
|
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
|
uint256 hash = block.vtx[i].GetHash(); |
|
|
|
|
// [MF] unsure. force 0, use userhash for filter, hash for merkletree
|
|
|
|
|
// [MF] FIXME: this is most likely broken!
|
|
|
|
|
if (i == 0 || filter.IsRelevantAndUpdate(block.vtx[i], block.vtx[i].GetUsernameHash())) |
|
|
|
|
if (i == 0 || filter.IsRelevantAndUpdate(block.vtx[i], hash)) |
|
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
|
vMatch.push_back(true); |
|
|
|
|
vMatchedTxn.push_back(make_pair(i, block.vtx[i].GetUsernameHash())); |
|
|
|
|
vMatchedTxn.push_back(make_pair(i, hash)); |
|
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
else |
|
|
|
|
vMatch.push_back(false); |
|
|
|
@ -2388,6 +2388,7 @@ bool static AlreadyHave(const CInv& inv)
@@ -2388,6 +2388,7 @@ bool static AlreadyHave(const CInv& inv)
|
|
|
|
|
* "inv" cmd of the current txs in memory. if recipient decides he |
|
|
|
|
* already has a given tx in txindex (by calling this function), |
|
|
|
|
* he would never ask/receive the key replacement. |
|
|
|
|
* Besides: HaveTxIndex is userhash, mempool is txhash. |
|
|
|
|
*/ |
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
if( !txInMap ) { |
|
|
|
@ -2447,7 +2448,6 @@ void static ProcessGetData(CNode* pfrom)
@@ -2447,7 +2448,6 @@ void static ProcessGetData(CNode* pfrom)
|
|
|
|
|
// Thus, the protocol spec specified allows for us to provide duplicate txn here,
|
|
|
|
|
// however we MUST always provide at least what the remote peer needs
|
|
|
|
|
typedef std::pair<unsigned int, uint256> PairType; |
|
|
|
|
// [MF] check if vMatchedTxn is userhash
|
|
|
|
|
BOOST_FOREACH(PairType& pair, merkleBlock.vMatchedTxn) |
|
|
|
|
if (!pfrom->setInventoryKnown.count(CInv(MSG_TX, pair.second))) |
|
|
|
|
pfrom->PushMessage("tx", block.vtx[pair.first]); |
|
|
|
@ -2863,7 +2863,7 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, string strCommand, CDataStream& vRecv)
@@ -2863,7 +2863,7 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, string strCommand, CDataStream& vRecv)
|
|
|
|
|
CTransaction tx; |
|
|
|
|
vRecv >> tx; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CInv inv(MSG_TX, tx.GetUsernameHash()); |
|
|
|
|
CInv inv(MSG_TX, tx.GetHash()); |
|
|
|
|
pfrom->AddInventoryKnown(inv); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Truncate messages to the size of the tx in them
|
|
|
|
|