You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
206 lines
8.4 KiB
206 lines
8.4 KiB
#!/usr/bin/env python3 |
|
# Copyright (c) 2016-2017 The Bitcoin Core developers |
|
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying |
|
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php. |
|
"""Test account RPCs. |
|
|
|
RPCs tested are: |
|
- getaccountaddress |
|
- getaddressesbyaccount |
|
- listaddressgroupings |
|
- setaccount |
|
- sendfrom (with account arguments) |
|
- move (with account arguments) |
|
""" |
|
|
|
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework |
|
from test_framework.util import assert_equal |
|
|
|
class WalletAccountsTest(BitcoinTestFramework): |
|
def set_test_params(self): |
|
self.setup_clean_chain = True |
|
self.num_nodes = 1 |
|
self.extra_args = [[]] |
|
|
|
def run_test(self): |
|
node = self.nodes[0] |
|
# Check that there's no UTXO on any of the nodes |
|
assert_equal(len(node.listunspent()), 0) |
|
|
|
# Note each time we call generate, all generated coins go into |
|
# the same address, so we call twice to get two addresses w/500 each |
|
node.generate(1) |
|
node.generate(101) |
|
assert_equal(node.getbalance(), 1000) |
|
|
|
# there should be 2 address groups |
|
# each with 1 address with a balance of 500 Kevacoins |
|
address_groups = node.listaddressgroupings() |
|
assert_equal(len(address_groups), 2) |
|
# the addresses aren't linked now, but will be after we send to the |
|
# common address |
|
linked_addresses = set() |
|
for address_group in address_groups: |
|
assert_equal(len(address_group), 1) |
|
assert_equal(len(address_group[0]), 2) |
|
assert_equal(address_group[0][1], 500) |
|
linked_addresses.add(address_group[0][0]) |
|
|
|
# send 500 from each address to a third address not in this wallet |
|
# There's some fee that will come back to us when the miner reward |
|
# matures. |
|
common_address = "msf4WtN1YQKXvNtvdFYt9JBnUD2FB41kjr" |
|
txid = node.sendmany( |
|
fromaccount="", |
|
amounts={common_address: 1000}, |
|
subtractfeefrom=[common_address], |
|
minconf=1, |
|
) |
|
tx_details = node.gettransaction(txid) |
|
fee = -tx_details['details'][0]['fee'] |
|
# there should be 1 address group, with the previously |
|
# unlinked addresses now linked (they both have 0 balance) |
|
address_groups = node.listaddressgroupings() |
|
assert_equal(len(address_groups), 1) |
|
assert_equal(len(address_groups[0]), 2) |
|
assert_equal(set([a[0] for a in address_groups[0]]), linked_addresses) |
|
assert_equal([a[1] for a in address_groups[0]], [0, 0]) |
|
|
|
node.generate(1) |
|
|
|
# we want to reset so that the "" account has what's expected. |
|
# otherwise we're off by exactly the fee amount as that's mined |
|
# and matures in the next 100 blocks |
|
node.sendfrom("", common_address, fee) |
|
amount_to_send = 1.0 |
|
|
|
# Create accounts and make sure subsequent account API calls |
|
# recognize the account/address associations. |
|
accounts = [Account(name) for name in ("a", "b", "c", "d", "e")] |
|
for account in accounts: |
|
account.add_receive_address(node.getaccountaddress(account.name)) |
|
account.verify(node) |
|
|
|
# Send a transaction to each account, and make sure this forces |
|
# getaccountaddress to generate a new receiving address. |
|
for account in accounts: |
|
node.sendtoaddress(account.receive_address, amount_to_send) |
|
account.add_receive_address(node.getaccountaddress(account.name)) |
|
account.verify(node) |
|
|
|
# Check the amounts received. |
|
node.generate(1) |
|
for account in accounts: |
|
assert_equal( |
|
node.getreceivedbyaddress(account.addresses[0]), amount_to_send) |
|
assert_equal(node.getreceivedbyaccount(account.name), amount_to_send) |
|
|
|
# Check that sendfrom account reduces listaccounts balances. |
|
for i, account in enumerate(accounts): |
|
to_account = accounts[(i+1) % len(accounts)] |
|
node.sendfrom(account.name, to_account.receive_address, amount_to_send) |
|
node.generate(1) |
|
for account in accounts: |
|
account.add_receive_address(node.getaccountaddress(account.name)) |
|
account.verify(node) |
|
assert_equal(node.getreceivedbyaccount(account.name), 2) |
|
node.move(account.name, "", node.getbalance(account.name)) |
|
account.verify(node) |
|
node.generate(101) |
|
expected_account_balances = {"": 52000} |
|
for account in accounts: |
|
expected_account_balances[account.name] = 0 |
|
assert_equal(node.listaccounts(), expected_account_balances) |
|
assert_equal(node.getbalance(""), 52000) |
|
|
|
# Check that setaccount can assign an account to a new unused address. |
|
for account in accounts: |
|
address = node.getaccountaddress("") |
|
node.setaccount(address, account.name) |
|
account.add_address(address) |
|
account.verify(node) |
|
assert(address not in node.getaddressesbyaccount("")) |
|
|
|
# Check that addmultisigaddress can assign accounts. |
|
for account in accounts: |
|
addresses = [] |
|
for x in range(10): |
|
addresses.append(node.getnewaddress()) |
|
multisig_address = node.addmultisigaddress(5, addresses, account.name)['address'] |
|
account.add_address(multisig_address) |
|
account.verify(node) |
|
node.sendfrom("", multisig_address, 500) |
|
node.generate(101) |
|
for account in accounts: |
|
assert_equal(node.getbalance(account.name), 500) |
|
|
|
# Check that setaccount can change the account of an address from a |
|
# different account. |
|
change_account(node, accounts[0].addresses[0], accounts[0], accounts[1]) |
|
|
|
# Check that setaccount can change the account of an address which |
|
# is the receiving address of a different account. |
|
change_account(node, accounts[0].receive_address, accounts[0], accounts[1]) |
|
|
|
# Check that setaccount can set the account of an address already |
|
# in the account. This is a no-op. |
|
change_account(node, accounts[2].addresses[0], accounts[2], accounts[2]) |
|
|
|
# Check that setaccount can set the account of an address which is |
|
# already the receiving address of the account. It would probably make |
|
# sense for this to be a no-op, but right now it resets the receiving |
|
# address, causing getaccountaddress to return a brand new address. |
|
change_account(node, accounts[2].receive_address, accounts[2], accounts[2]) |
|
|
|
class Account: |
|
def __init__(self, name): |
|
# Account name |
|
self.name = name |
|
# Current receiving address associated with this account. |
|
self.receive_address = None |
|
# List of all addresses assigned with this account |
|
self.addresses = [] |
|
|
|
def add_address(self, address): |
|
assert_equal(address not in self.addresses, True) |
|
self.addresses.append(address) |
|
|
|
def add_receive_address(self, address): |
|
self.add_address(address) |
|
self.receive_address = address |
|
|
|
def verify(self, node): |
|
if self.receive_address is not None: |
|
assert self.receive_address in self.addresses |
|
assert_equal(node.getaccountaddress(self.name), self.receive_address) |
|
|
|
for address in self.addresses: |
|
assert_equal(node.getaccount(address), self.name) |
|
|
|
assert_equal( |
|
set(node.getaddressesbyaccount(self.name)), set(self.addresses)) |
|
|
|
|
|
def change_account(node, address, old_account, new_account): |
|
assert_equal(address in old_account.addresses, True) |
|
node.setaccount(address, new_account.name) |
|
|
|
old_account.addresses.remove(address) |
|
new_account.add_address(address) |
|
|
|
# Calling setaccount on an address which was previously the receiving |
|
# address of a different account should reset the receiving address of |
|
# the old account, causing getaccountaddress to return a brand new |
|
# address. |
|
if address == old_account.receive_address: |
|
new_address = node.getaccountaddress(old_account.name) |
|
assert_equal(new_address not in old_account.addresses, True) |
|
assert_equal(new_address not in new_account.addresses, True) |
|
old_account.add_receive_address(new_address) |
|
|
|
old_account.verify(node) |
|
new_account.verify(node) |
|
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == '__main__': |
|
WalletAccountsTest().main()
|
|
|