Motivation for moving these is to make supporting IPC simpler (#10102), so
these lookups can be one-shot IPC requests, instead of back-and-forth
interactions over the IPC channel.
Also these functions are potentially useful outside of the bitcoin GUI (e.g.
for RPCs).
Before this commit, the checkbox would always start off unchecked. After this
commit it will respect the -walletrbf setting (which is currently false by
default).
Introduce a PlatformStyle to handle platform-specific customization of
the UI.
This replaces 'scicon', as well as #ifdefs to determine whether to place
icons on buttons.
The selected PlatformStyle defaults to the platform that the application
was compiled on, but can be overridden from the command line with
`-uiplatform=<x>`.
Also fixes the warning from #6328.
QT_NO_KEYWORDS prevents Qt from defining the `foreach`, `signals`,
`slots` and `emit` macros.
Avoid overlap between Qt macros and boost - for example #undef hackiness
in #6421.
Note that this will also require translation changes in Transifex for the key
"A fee higher than %1 is considered an insanely high fee." which is now
"A fee higher than %1 is considered an absurdly high fee."
Signed-off-by: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
- this is based on #4122 (which can be closed)
Currently a payment request is only checked for expiration upon receipt.
It should be checked again immediately before sending coins to prevent
the user from paying to an expired invoice which would then require a
customer service interaction.
- add static verifyExpired() function to PaymentServer to be able to use
the same validation code in GUI and unit-testing code
- extend unit tests to use that function and also add an unit test which
overflows, because payment requests allow expires as uint64, whereas we
use int64_t for verification of expired payment requests
Move transaction new/update notification to TransactionTableModel.
This moves the concerns to where they're actually handled.
No need to bounce this through wallet model.
- Do wallet transaction preprocessing on signal handler side;
avoids locking cs_main/cs_wallet on notification in GUI thread
(except for new transactions)
This number was still tracked even though it's shown nowhere in the UI
anymore. It was originally removed because it didn't match the actual number of
records in the view (which contains outputs, not transactions) thus was
confusing people.
Jonas Schnelli