f6d18f5 Qt/Intro: Explain a bit more what will happen first time (Luke Dashjr)
50c5657 Qt/Intro: Storage shouldn't grow significantly with pruning enabled (Luke Dashjr)
9adb694 Qt/Intro: Move sizeWarningLabel text into C++ code (Luke Dashjr)
Remove "nLowestTimestamp <= chainActive.Tip()->GetBlockTimeMax()" check from
importmulti, which is always true because nLowestTimestamp is set to the
minimum of the most recent block time and all the imported key timestamps,
which is necessarily lower than the maximum block time.
e662af3 Use 2 hour grace period for key timestamps in importmulti rescans (Russell Yanofsky)
38d3e9e [qa] Extend import-rescan.py to test imports on pruned nodes. (Russell Yanofsky)
c28583d [qa] Extend import-rescan.py to test specific key timestamps (Russell Yanofsky)
8be0866 [qa] Simplify import-rescan.py (Russell Yanofsky)
- If the -maxsigcachesize parameter is set to zero, setup a minimum sized
sigcache (2 elements) rather than segfaulting.
- Handle maxsigcachesize being negative
- Handle maxsigcachesize being too large
Get rid of partial functions so the test can be more easily extended to add
more variants of imports with options that affect rescanning (e.g. different
key timestamps).
Also change the second half of the test to send /to/ the imported addresses,
instead of /from/ the imported addresses. The goal of this part of the test was
to confirm that the wallet would pick up new transactions after an import
regardless of whether or not a rescan happened during the import. But because
the wallet can only do this reliably for incoming transactions and not outgoing
transactions (which require the wallet to look up transaction inputs) the test
previously was less meaningful than it should have been.
A new AssertLockHeld(cs_wallet) call was added in commit a58370e
"Dedup nTimeFirstKey update logic" (part of PR #9108).
The lock held assertion will fail when loading prexisting wallets files from
before the #9108 merge that have watch-only keys.
Fixes a bug in AcceptBlock() in invoking CheckBlock() with incorrect
arguments, and restores a call to CheckBlock() from ProcessNewBlock()
as belt-and-suspenders.
Updates the (overspecified) tests to match behavior.
Because it is used inconsistently at least version 5.4.0 of g++ to
complains about methods that don't use override. There is two ways to go
about this: remove override from the methods having it, or add it to the
methods missing it. I chose the second.
Wladimir J. van der Laan