This tracks the set of all known invalid-themselves blocks (ie
blocks which we attempted to connect but which were found to be
invalid). This is used to cheaply check if new headers build on an
invalid chain.
While we're at it we also resolve an edge-case in invalidateblock
on pruned nodes which results in them needing a reindex if they
fail to reorg.
This is a simple change that makes our accept requirements the
same as our request requirements, (ever so slightly) further
decoupling our consensus logic from our FindNextBlocksToDownload
logic in net_processing.
There is no reason to wish to store blocks on disk always just
because a peer is whitelisted. This appears to be a historical
quirk to avoid breaking things when the accept limits were added.
Nowhere else in the protocol do we send headers which are for
blocks we have not fully validated except in response to getheaders
messages with a null locator. On my public node I have not seen any
such request (whether for an invalid block or not) in at least two
years of debug.log output, indicating that this should have minimal
impact.
Reading the variable mapBlockIndex requires holding the mutex cs_main.
The new "Disconnect outbound peers relaying invalid headers" code
added in commit 37886d5e2f and merged
as part of #11568 two days ago did not lock cs_main prior to accessing
mapBlockIndex.
Warnings prior to this commit:
```
addrman.cpp:390:24: warning: comparison of integers of different signs: 'size_type' (aka 'unsigned long') and 'int' [-Wsign-compare]
if (vRandom.size() != nTried + nNew)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
addrman.cpp:411:52: warning: comparison of integers of different signs: 'int' and 'size_type' (aka 'unsigned long') [-Wsign-compare]
if (info.nRandomPos < 0 || info.nRandomPos >= vRandom.size() || vRandom[info.nRandomPos] != n)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
addrman.cpp:419:25: warning: comparison of integers of different signs: 'size_type' (aka 'unsigned long') and 'int' [-Wsign-compare]
if (setTried.size() != nTried)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~
addrman.cpp:421:23: warning: comparison of integers of different signs: 'size_type' (aka 'unsigned long') and 'int' [-Wsign-compare]
if (mapNew.size() != nNew)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~
4 warnings generated.
```
Currently we have no rotation of outbound peers. If an outbound peer
stops serving us blocks, or is on a consensus-incompatible chain with
less work than our tip (but otherwise valid headers), then we will never
disconnect that peer, even though that peer is using one of our 8
outbound connection slots. Because we rely on our outbound peers to
find an honest node in order to reach consensus, allowing an
incompatible peer to occupy one of those slots is undesirable,
particularly if it is possible for all such slots to be occupied by such
peers.
Protect against this by always checking to see if a peer's best known
block has less work than our tip, and if so, set a 20 minute timeout --
if the peer is still not known to have caught up to a chain with as much
work as ours after 20 minutes, then send a single getheaders message,
wait 2 more minutes, and if a better header hasn't been received by then,
disconnect that peer.
Note:
- we do not require that our peer sync to the same tip as ours, just an
equal or greater work tip. (Doing otherwise would risk partitioning the
network in the event of a chain split, and is also unnecessary.)
- we pick 4 of our outbound peers and do not subject them to this logic,
to be more conservative. We don't wish to permit temporary network
issues (or an attacker) to excessively disrupt network topology.
Change suggested by Cory Fields <cory-nospam-@coryfields.com> who noticed
listsinceblock would ignore invalid block hashes causing it to return a
completely unfiltered list of transactions.
A peer could try to waste our resources by sending us unrequested blocks with
low work, eg to fill up our disk. Since
e2652002b6 we no longer request blocks until we
know we're on a chain with more than nMinimumChainWork (our anti-DoS
threshold), but we would still process unrequested blocks that had more work
than our tip. This commit fixes that behavior.
Make sure wallet databases have unique fileids. If they don't, throw an error.
BDB caches do not work properly when more than one open database has the same
fileid, because values written to one database may show up in reads to other
databases.
Bitcoin will never create different databases with the same fileid, but users
can create them by manually copying database files.
BDB caching bug was reported by Chris Moore <dooglus@gmail.com>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11429Fixes#11429
Now using a std::unique_ptr, the Db instance is correctly released
when CDB initialization fails.
The internal CDB state and mapFileUseCount are only mutated when
the CDB initialization succeeds.
Note that UpdatedBlockTip is also used in net_processing to
announce new blocks to peers. As this may need additional review,
this change is included in its own commit.
This runs Block{Connected,Disconnected}, SetBestChain, Inventory,
and TransactionAddedToMempool on the background scheduler thread.
Of those, only BlockConnected is used outside of Wallet/ZMQ, and
is used only for orphan transaction removal in net_processing,
something which does not need to be synchronous with anything
else.
This partially reverts #9583, re-enabling some of the gains from
#7946. This does not, however, re-enable the gains achieved by
repeatedly releasing cs_main between each transaction processed.
This avoid calling out to mempool state during coin selection,
balance calculation, etc. In the next commit we ensure all wallet
callbacks from CValidationInterface happen in the same queue,
serialized with each other. This helps to avoid re-introducing one
of the issues described in #9584 [1] by further disconnecting
wallet from current chain/mempool state.
Thanks to @morcos for the suggestion to do this.
Note that there are several race conditions introduced here:
* If a user calls sendrawtransaction from RPC, adding a
transaction which is "trusted" (ie from them) and pays them
change, it may not be immediately used by coin selection until
the notification callbacks finish running. No such race is
introduced in normal transaction-sending RPCs as this case is
explicitly handled.
* Until Block{Connected,Disconnected} and
TransactionAddedToMempool calls also run in the CSceduler
background thread, there is a race where
TransactionAddedToMempool might be called after a
Block{Connected,Disconnected} call happens.
* Wallet will write a new best chain from the SetBestChain
callback prior to having processed the transaction from that
block.
[1] "you could go to select coins, need to use 0-conf change, but
such 0-conf change may have been included in a block who's
callbacks have not yet been processed - resulting in thinking they
are not in mempool and, thus, not selectable."
This prevents the wallet-RPCs-return-stale-info issue from being
re-introduced when new-block callbacks no longer happen in the
block-connection cs_main lock
This is both good practice (we want to move all such callbacks
into a background thread eventually) and prevents a lock inversion
when we go to use this in wallet (mempool.cs->cs_wallet and
cs_wallet->mempool.cs would otherwise both be used).
This is currently unused, but will by used by wallet to cache when
transactions are in the mempool, obviating the need for calls to
mempool from CWalletTx::InMempool()
Suhas Daftuar