Clear test_node.last_block before requesting blocks in the
compactblocks_not_at_tip test so comparisons won't fail if a blocks were received
before the test started.
The bug doesn't currently cause any problems due to the order tests run, but
this will change in the next commit.
Bug caused the wait_for_block_announcement to be called on the wrong node,
leading to nondeterminism and occasional test failures. Bug was introduced in
merge commit:
d075479 Merge #8882: [qa] Fix race conditions in p2p-compactblocks.py and sendheaders.py
Underlying commits which conflicted were:
27acfc1 [qa] Update p2p-compactblocks.py for compactblocks v2
6976db2 [qa] Another attempt to fix race condition in p2p-compactblocks.py
The first commit changed the test_compactblock_construction function signature
and second commit added code which wasn't updated during the merge to use the
new arguments.
Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@chaincode.com> noticed the bug and suggested the fix.
- Use the python standard logging library
- Run all tests and report all failing test-cases (rather than stop after one test case fails)
- If output is different from expected output, log a contextual diff.
Refer to the right file in the top-level README.md.
Having only one file with test documentation saves some confusion about
where things are documented.
444c673 bench: Add benchmark for lockedpool allocation/deallocation (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
6567999 rpc: Add `getmemoryinfo` call (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
4536148 support: Add LockedPool (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
f4d1fc2 wallet: Get rid of LockObject and UnlockObject calls in key.h (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
999e4c9 wallet: Change CCrypter to use vectors with secure allocator (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
GetTotalBlocksEstimate is no longer used and it was the only thing
the checkpoint tests were testing.
Since checkpoints are on their way out it makes more sense to remove
the test file than to cook up a new pointless test.
This introduces a 'minimum chain work' chainparam which is intended
to be the known amount of work in the chain for the network at the
time of software release. If you don't have this much work, you're
not yet caught up.
This is used instead of the count of blocks test from checkpoints.
This criteria is trivial to keep updated as there is no element of
subjectivity, trust, or position dependence to it. It is also a more
reliable metric of sync status than a block count.
Fixes newly initialized bloom filters being
constructed with isEmpty(false), which still
works but loses the possible speedup when
checking for key membership in an empty filter.
This will result in many more calls to CheckBlockIndex when
connecting a list of headers (eg in ::HEADERS messages processing)
but its only enabled in debug mode, and that should mostly just be
during IBD, so it should be OK.
UnloadBlockIndex is only used during init if we end up reindexing
to clear our block state so that we can start over. However, at
that time no connections have been brought up as CConnman hasn't
been started yet, so all of the network processing state logic is
empty when its called.
Additionally, the initialization of the recentRejects set is moved
to InitPeerLogic.
This splits the output comparison for `bitcoin-tx` into two steps:
- First, check for data mismatch, parsing the data as json or hex
depending on the extension of the output file
- Then, check if the literal string matches
For either of these cases give a different error.
This prevents wild goose chases when e.g. a trailing space doesn't match
exactly, and makes sure that both test output and examples are valid
data of the purported format.
Recent discussion (in IRC meetings, and e.g. #8989) has shown a
preference for the default confirm target for smartfees to be 6 instead
of 2, to avoid overpaying fees for questionable gain.
6 is also a compromise between the GUI's pre-#8989 value of 25 and the
bitcoind `-txconfirmtarget` default of 2. These were unified in #8989,
but this has made the (overly expensive) default of 2 as GUI default.
Wladimir J. van der Laan