a473eff [bench] Replace 0.00(000)1 with MICRO/MILLI #defines in validation.cpp. (Karl-Johan Alm)
5f850b0 [bench] Include ms/blk stats in Connect* benchmarks. (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
Display the average per block runtime for the various benchmarked times in the block connect functions to give an overview of long(er) term time distribution statistics.
Tree-SHA512: 3d6f24f6b9e3dbb448a647e2cda8e7b90ad6a16d4821f49f426a8e1ebc3ce5a0cf0a8cde82213e293affba441615702dfe50822c8c818e282af03bfe383d83e0
de9a1db Acquire cs_main lock before cs_wallet during wallet initialization (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
`CWallet::MarkConflicted` may acquire the `cs_main` lock after `CWalletDB::LoadWallet` acquires the `cs_wallet` lock during wallet initialization. (`CWalletDB::LoadWallet` calls `ReadKeyValue` which calls `CWallet::LoadToWallet` which calls `CWallet::MarkConflicted`). This is the opposite order that `cs_main` and `cs_wallet` locks are acquired in the rest of the code, and so leads to `POTENTIAL DEADLOCK DETECTED` errors if bitcoin is built with `-DDEBUG_LOCKORDER`.
This commit changes `CWallet::LoadWallet` (which calls `CWalletDB::LoadWallet`) to acquire both locks in the standard order.
Error was reported by @luke-jr in https://botbot.me/freenode/bitcoin-core-dev/msg/90244330/
Tree-SHA512: 353fe21bc0a4a2828b41876897001a3c414d4b115ee7430925bd391d8bc396fca81661145d00996c1ba1a01516d9acf8b89fb5c3da27092f5f3aa7e37ef26ffa
6af49dd Output a bit more information for fee calculation report. (Alex Morcos)
a54c7b9 Fix rounding errors in calculation of minimum change size (Alex Morcos)
Pull request description:
Thanks to @juscamarena for reporting this.
Please backport to 0.15.
There was a potential rounding error where the fee for the change added to the fee for the original tx could be less than the fee for the tx including change.
This is fixed in the first commit. The second commit adds one more snippet of information in the fee calculation report. I actually realized that there is more information that would be nice to report, but we can add that post 0.15.
An open question is whether we should be returning failure if the test in line 2885 is hit or just resetting pick_new_inputs and continuing. Originally I made it a failure to avoid any possible infinite loops. But the case hit here is an example of where that logic possibly backfired.
Tree-SHA512: efe049781acc1f6a8ad429a689359ac6f7b7c44cdfc9578a866dff4a2f6596e8de474a89d25c704f31ef4f8c89af770e98b75ef06c25419d5a6dfc87247bf274
b426e24 Remove redundant explicitly defined copy ctors (Dan Raviv)
Pull request description:
CFeeRate and CTxMemPoolEntry have explicitly defined copy ctors which has the same functionality as the implicit default copy ctors which would have been generated otherwise.
Besides being redundant, it violates the rule of three (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_three_(C%2B%2B_programming) ).
(Of course, the rule of three doesn't -really- cause a resource management issue here, but the reason for that is exactly that there is no need for an explicit copy ctor in the first place since no resources are being managed).
Tree-SHA512: c9294ebf5d955d230b44c6f0d20822975d44a34471a717d656f8b17181bcd2827f47ba897edf5accd650f5998c58aadc8ab3c91a3f556f1f6de36830ed4069ce
e40fa98 Simplify bswap_16 implementation (danra)
Pull request description:
Simplify bswap_16 implementation on platforms which don't already have it defined.
This has no effect on the generated assembly; it just simplifies the source code.
Tree-SHA512: 1c6ac1d187a2751da75256d12b6b890160d15246dd2c2b6a56748ec43482e3a5a3323be2910f07b42d3dc243a568c7412c26eaa036efec764436e988abd1c3f1
82dd719 rpc: Write authcookie atomically (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Use POSIX rename atomicity at the `bitcoind` side to create a working
cookie atomically:
- Write `.cookie.tmp`, close file
- Rename `.cookie.tmp` to `.cookie`
This avoids clients reading invalid/partial cookies as in #11129. As such, this is an alternative to that PR.
Tree-SHA512: 47fcc1ed2ff3d8fed4b7441e4939f29cc99b57b7a035673c3b55a124a2e49c8a904637a6ff700dd13a184be8c0255707d74781f8e626314916418954e2467e03
e254830 Make tabs toolbar no longer have a context menu (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Adds a contextMenuPolicy of Qt::PreventContextMenu to prevent the tabs toolbar from showing a context menu that allows it to be hidden.
Fixes#11168
Tree-SHA512: 8900b3c1a891ead3c9a20dc365b436fa75f97dbe0dfa7e20ee26fd9d09f3fee6eda286b0c075ed89fe1361608ecbdd87c744e37d97a3fba62493a86dedda867b
CFeeRate and CTxMemPoolEntry have explicitly defined copy ctors which has the same functionality as the implicit default copy ctors which would have been generated otherwise.
Besides being redundant, it violates the rule of three (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_three_(C%2B%2B_programming) ).
(Of course, the rule of three doesn't -really- cause a resource management issue here, but the reason for that is exactly that there is no need for an explicit copy ctor in the first place since no resources are being managed).
CFeeRate has an explicitly defined copy ctor which has the same functionality as the implicit default copy ctor which would h
ave been generated otherwise.
946638d0a Improve versionbits_computeblockversion test code consistency (danra)
Pull request description:
In this test, `nTime` is used for all the calls to `Mine()`, each time being set to the correct time beforehand, except for in the last few calls to `Mine()` where `nStartTime` is used directly, even though `nTime` is still set to `nStartTime` beforehand. `nTime` just remains unused for these last few calls to `Mine()`.
Changed the last few calls to `Mine()` to use `nTime` instead, improving consistency. This also fixes an unused value static analyzer warning about `nTime` being set to a value which is never used.
Tree-SHA512: f17cf1d29fd7097d53c0135d6357ee50943bd81b5ce0be785a37b85d34b5127cd6cc17ef844b519e19c33f2d96f7ababee643b9fba7afb031f444b2cfaeedbfd
In this test, `nTime` is used for all the calls to `Mine()`, each time being set to the correct time beforehand, except for in the last few calls to `Mine()` where `nStartTime` is used directly, even though `nTime` is still set to `nStartTime` beforehand. `nTime` just remains unused for these last few calls to `Mine()`.
Changed the last few calls to `Mine()` to use `nTime` instead, improving consistency. This also fixes an unused value static analyzer warning about `nTime` being set to a value which is never used.
bc70ab5 Fix header guards using reserved identifiers (Dan Raviv)
Pull request description:
Identifiers beginning with an underscore followed immediately by an uppercase letter are reserved.
Tree-SHA512: 32b45e0aef6f6325bc3cbdea399532437490b753621149374df27e1c1eed6739ad1a09ae368e888cab8d01fb757f1b190c45a0854d2861de39a9296f17e29d9e
f01103c MOVEONLY: Init functions wallet/wallet.cpp -> wallet/init.cpp (Russell Yanofsky)
e7fe320 MOVEONLY: Fee functions wallet/wallet.cpp -> wallet/fees.cpp (Russell Yanofsky)
d97fe20 Move some static functions out of wallet.h/cpp (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This just moves some static wallet fee and init functions out of `wallet/wallet.cpp` and into new `wallet/fees.cpp` and `wallet/init.cpp` source files. There is one commit updating declarations and callers, followed by two MOVEONLY commits actually moving the function bodies.
This change is desirable because wallet.h/cpp are monolithic and hard to navigate, so pulling things out and grouping together pieces of related functionality should improve the organization.
Another motivation is the wallet process separation work in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10973, where (at least initially) parameter parsing and fee estimation are still done in the main process rather than the wallet process, and having functions that run in different processes scrambled up throughout wallet.cpp is unnecessarily confusing.
Tree-SHA512: 6e6982ff82b2ab4e681c043907e2b1801ceb9513394730070f16c46ad338278a863f5b3759aa13db76a259b268b1c919c81f4e339f0796a3cfb990161e8c316d
Simplify bswap_16 implementation on platforms which don't already have it defined.
This has no effect on the generated assembly; it just simplifies the source code.
Use POSIX rename atomicity at the `bitcoind` side to create a working
cookie atomically:
- Write `.cookie.tmp`, close file
- Rename `.cookie.tmp` to `.cookie`
This avoids clients reading invalid/partial cookies as in #11129.
f1708ef89 Add recommendation: By default, declare single-argument constructors `explicit` (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up to the now merged #10969.
Add recommendation:
> By default, declare single-argument constructors `explicit`.
>
> - *Rationale*: This is a precaution to avoid unintended conversions that might arise when single-argument constructors are used as implicit conversion functions.
>
Tree-SHA512: 1ceb1008a7863ebd0f09ba9c06b4e28b3b03265d7381f9d0c8bd4be1663d5d0392de0ecd811027aa27c0d962723674b245b3c165a437942a776f3525db39d36b
cd0ea4874 Changing -txindex requires -reindex, not -reindex-chainstate (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
If there's an 0.15.0rc3, this should go in it.
Tree-SHA512: 857e77f0af9c055a3d1d91f37474ee9e06d6bc8c5ed21b29201b6c386801e7041523949076cdf0daa4d357a5175ce49394d85a1bedfbf13f3e577bdb6da1d6ce
c6ec4358a [tests] Add bitcoin_cli.py test script (John Newbery)
b23549f6e [tests] add TestNodeCLI class for calling bitcoin-cli for a node (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
We don't test bitcoin-cli at all. That means that we can miss inconsistencies between the bitcoin-cli client and the RPC interface, such as #10698 and #10747. It also means that the various bitcoin-cli options and features are untested and regressions could be silently introduced.
Let's fix that.
This PR adds bitcoin-cli testing in the python functional test_framework:
1. Add a bitcoin_cli.py test script that tests bitcoin-cli. At the moment it only tests that the result of `getinfo` is the same if you run it as an RPC or through bitcoin-cli, but can easily be extended to test additional bitcoin-cli features
**EDIT: `--usecli` option is moved to a separate PR. This PR now only covers the bitcoin_cli.py test.**
2. ~Add a `--usecli` option to the test framework. This changes the test to use bitcoin-cli for all RPC calls instead of using direct HTTP requests. This is somewhat experimental. It works for most tests, but there are some cases where it can't work transparently because:~
- ~the testcase is asserting on a specific error code, and bitcoin-cli returns a different error code from the direct RPC~
- ~we're sending a very large RPC request (eg `submitblock`) and it can't be serialized into a shell bitcoin-cli call.~
~I think that even though `--usecli` doesn't work on all tests, it's still a useful experimental feature. Future potential enhancements:~
- ~enhance the framework to automatically skip tests that are known to fail with bitcoin-cli if the `--usecli` option is used.~
- ~run a subset of tests in Travis with `-usecli`~
This builds on and requires the `TestNode` PR #10711 . As an aside, this is a good demonstration of how tidy it is to add additional features/interfaces now that test node logic/state is encapsulated in a TestNode class.
Addresses #10791
Tree-SHA512: a1e6be12e8e007f6f67b3d3bbcd142d835787300831eb38e6027a1ad25ca9d79c4bc99a41b19e31ee95205cba1b3b2d21a688b5909316aad70bfc2b4eb6d8a52
CWallet::MarkConflicted may acquire the cs_main lock after
CWalletDB::LoadWallet acquires the cs_wallet lock during wallet initialization.
(CWalletDB::LoadWallet calls ReadKeyValue which calls CWallet::LoadToWallet
which calls CWallet::MarkConflicted). This is the opposite order that cs_main
and cs_wallet locks are acquired in the rest of the code, and so leads to
POTENTIAL DEADLOCK DETECTED errors if bitcoin is built with -DDEBUG_LOCKORDER.
This commit changes CWallet::LoadWallet (which calls CWalletDB::LoadWallet) to
acquire both locks in the standard order. It also fixes some tests that were
acquiring wallet and main locks out of order and failed with the new locking in
CWallet::LoadWallet.
Error was reported by Luke Dashjr <luke-jr@utopios.org> in
https://botbot.me/freenode/bitcoin-core-dev/msg/90244330/
79191f5 Add option -stdinrpcpass to allow RPC password to be read from standard input (Joe Harvell)
Pull request description:
Add a new command-line option to bitcoin-cli that allows the RPC password to be read from standard intput. The purpose of this option is to allow secure RPC password input to bitcoin-cli through an external program that is capable of disabling terminal echo.
This option works similarly to the existing -stdin option, and also works when combined with that option.
I have also written a simple ncurses based program that disables echo, gets input from the terminal and writes to standard output. I couldn't find an existing askpass program that doesn't require graphics libraries, since they are primarily used for getting passwords in a graphics environment. Unless someone can point out a suitable existing askpass program, I plan to submit my ncurses program to the contrib directory separately from this pull request.
Tree-SHA512: 6d426d757de325d928fab42ea8e423273a7dea9f838acb745ccf9f9daa2b47e23044ec1c019cda1a081253f5145fc10f79ae82dfe7f8e952e1f271ec56018e14
fa14b67 [doc] build-windows: Mention that only trusty works (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This should prevent people from running into the issues to later find that there is no solution yet.
Tree-SHA512: c0512bb15ebd62113a4195a9577fec4ddacf164509673e178c6b5445c16ab7b110a13ba829e6eebb2a66dff61eeac6ec77f7c5f60bd64685a0c0d99f71f4edf7
08ce33f8e qa: Move wait_until to util (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This moves `wait_until` to `util.py` to make it generally available to python tests.
Also, `wait_until` now takes an optional lock that is acquired while testing the predicate.
Previously the lock was always acquired, even when it was not necessary, cf. `disconnect_ban.py`.
Tree-SHA512: 18e452a017a6566fa8ad09bde058e1b841e167039dc63299e70cfa7a6dcbc779581e60ca3e8eb2f1b610767d5208b9376c203eb11015b250fd0542b5eb4215a8
2b4ea52 [tests] fix timeout issues from TestNode (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Fixes a couple of bugs from the introduction of TestNode:
- test scripts were no longer able to specify a custom timeout for
starting a node. Therefore tests with nodes that take a long time to
start up (eg pruning.py) would fail.
- the test for whether a node has failed on start up was broken
by changing 'assert x is None' to 'assert not x'. Since
subprocess.poll() can return None (indicating the node is still running)
or 0 (indicating the node exited with return code 0), this was a
regression.
Tree-SHA512: 42a62a5459eea2e5d83b44dae2a5ccc7b15eb7fef8f8745ff04884dbba8f79d66ffdd65c67d37f6865b36da3f522bcdd0d6ea99861d7ce86dd8a56dc29cd643f
Fixes a couple of bugs from the introduction of TestNode:
- test scripts were no longer able to specify a custom timeout for
starting a node. Therefore tests with nodes that take a long time to
start up (eg pruning.py) would fail.
- the test for whether a node has failed on start up was broken
by changing 'assert x is None' to 'assert not x'. Since
subprocess.poll() can return None (indicating the node is still running)
or 0 (indicating the node exited with return code 0), this was a
regression.
ecb11f5 Document the non-strict-DER-conformance of one test in tx_valid.json. (Andreas Schildbach)
Tree-SHA512: 4d5ba4645fbfe8fe3f1baaa5f1a1152cdd2cbf3d901f38d8e7fbd56b16caa6a8a17f2a48c74fb725ce454dd1c870b81b2238e89d0639fcd4eee858554726e996
In a signature, it contains an ASN1 integer which isn't strict-DER conformant due to excessive 0xff padding:
0xffda47bfc776bcd269da4832626ac332adfca6dd835e8ecd83cd1ebe7d709b0e
a65e028 Build with --enable-werror under OS X (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Build with `--enable-werror` under OS X.
As suggested by @TheBlueMatt in #10866. This will allow catching violations using Travis CI which does a `clang` build for OS X.
Tree-SHA512: 326248897e0776106983e0824e7e80eee3c6e584a1d360f429c30f3375dad83ab4c360c86ab0729bd9ede747ea0caa13cd6a7c35072ed9b845362423c9c37a64
a897d0e tests: Remove OldSetKeyFromPassphrase/OldEncrypt/OldDecrypt (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Reduces the number of non-free:d allocs with four (Δ in use at exit = -928 bytes).
With this patch applied:
```
$ valgrind --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite --run_test=wallet_crypto
…
==20243== HEAP SUMMARY:
==20243== in use at exit: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks
==20243== total heap usage: 53,138 allocs, 53,137 frees, 49,600,420 bytes allocated
==20243==
==20243== 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 1
==20243== at 0x4C2DB8F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==20243== by 0x6AA5EFF: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21)
==20243== by 0x40106B9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72)
==20243== by 0x40107CA: call_init (dl-init.c:30)
==20243== by 0x40107CA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120)
==20243== by 0x4000C69: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so)
==20243== by 0x2: ???
==20243== by 0xFFF0006A2: ???
==20243== by 0xFFF0006B8: ???
==20243== by 0xFFF0006CF: ???
==20243==
==20243== LEAK SUMMARY:
==20243== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==20243== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==20243== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==20243== still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks
==20243== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
```
Without this patch applied:
```
$ valgrind --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite --run_test=wallet_crypto
…
==19023== HEAP SUMMARY:
==19023== in use at exit: 73,632 bytes in 5 blocks
==19023== total heap usage: 52,718 allocs, 52,713 frees, 49,502,962 bytes allocated
==19023==
==19023== 24 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 5
==19023== at 0x4C2DB8F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==19023== by 0x642DE77: CRYPTO_malloc (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x64E5665: lh_insert (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x64E7BB3: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x64E87AD: ERR_get_state (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x64E883D: ERR_put_error (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x64EAAE4: EVP_DecryptFinal_ex (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x3AD150: wallet_crypto::OldDecrypt(std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> > const&, std::vector<unsigned char, secure_allocator<unsigned char> >&, unsigned char const*, unsigned char const*) (crypto_tests.cpp:81)
==19023== by 0x3AF892: wallet_crypto::TestCrypter::TestDecrypt(CCrypter const&, std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> > const&, std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> > const&) (crypto_tests.cpp:137)
==19023== by 0x3AD5E9: wallet_crypto::decrypt::test_method() (crypto_tests.cpp:223)
==19023== by 0x3ADC11: wallet_crypto::decrypt_invoker() (crypto_tests.cpp:216)
==19023== by 0x182596: invoke<void (*)()> (callback.hpp:56)
==19023== by 0x182596: boost::unit_test::ut_detail::callback0_impl_t<boost::unit_test::ut_detail::unused, void (*)()>::invoke() (callback.hpp:89)
==19023==
==19023== 128 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 2 of 5
==19023== at 0x4C2DB8F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==19023== by 0x642DE77: CRYPTO_malloc (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x64E5331: lh_new (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x64E7862: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x64E7B7F: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x64E87AD: ERR_get_state (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x64E883D: ERR_put_error (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x64EAAE4: EVP_DecryptFinal_ex (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x3AD150: wallet_crypto::OldDecrypt(std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> > const&, std::vector<unsigned char, secure_allocator<unsigned char> >&, unsigned char const*, unsigned char const*) (crypto_tests.cpp:81)
==19023== by 0x3AF892: wallet_crypto::TestCrypter::TestDecrypt(CCrypter const&, std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> > const&, std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> > const&) (crypto_tests.cpp:137)
==19023== by 0x3AD5E9: wallet_crypto::decrypt::test_method() (crypto_tests.cpp:223)
==19023== by 0x3ADC11: wallet_crypto::decrypt_invoker() (crypto_tests.cpp:216)
==19023==
==19023== 176 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 3 of 5
==19023== at 0x4C2DB8F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==19023== by 0x642DE77: CRYPTO_malloc (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x64E530F: lh_new (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x64E7862: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x64E7B7F: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x64E87AD: ERR_get_state (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x64E883D: ERR_put_error (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x64EAAE4: EVP_DecryptFinal_ex (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x3AD150: wallet_crypto::OldDecrypt(std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> > const&, std::vector<unsigned char, secure_allocator<unsigned char> >&, unsigned char const*, unsigned char const*) (crypto_tests.cpp:81)
==19023== by 0x3AF892: wallet_crypto::TestCrypter::TestDecrypt(CCrypter const&, std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> > const&, std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> > const&) (crypto_tests.cpp:137)
==19023== by 0x3AD5E9: wallet_crypto::decrypt::test_method() (crypto_tests.cpp:223)
==19023== by 0x3ADC11: wallet_crypto::decrypt_invoker() (crypto_tests.cpp:216)
==19023==
==19023== 600 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 4 of 5
==19023== at 0x4C2DB8F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==19023== by 0x642DE77: CRYPTO_malloc (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x64E8745: ERR_get_state (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x64E883D: ERR_put_error (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x64EAAE4: EVP_DecryptFinal_ex (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
==19023== by 0x3AD150: wallet_crypto::OldDecrypt(std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> > const&, std::vector<unsigned char, secure_allocator<unsigned char> >&, unsigned char const*, unsigned char const*) (crypto_tests.cpp:81)
==19023== by 0x3AF892: wallet_crypto::TestCrypter::TestDecrypt(CCrypter const&, std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> > const&, std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> > const&) (crypto_tests.cpp:137)
==19023== by 0x3AD5E9: wallet_crypto::decrypt::test_method() (crypto_tests.cpp:223)
==19023== by 0x3ADC11: wallet_crypto::decrypt_invoker() (crypto_tests.cpp:216)
==19023== by 0x182596: invoke<void (*)()> (callback.hpp:56)
==19023== by 0x182596: boost::unit_test::ut_detail::callback0_impl_t<boost::unit_test::ut_detail::unused, void (*)()>::invoke() (callback.hpp:89)
==19023== by 0x596CCB0: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.58.0)
==19023== by 0x594C995: boost::execution_monitor::catch_signals(boost::unit_test::callback0<int> const&) (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.58.0)
==19023==
==19023== 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 5 of 5
==19023== at 0x4C2DB8F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==19023== by 0x6AA5EFF: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21)
==19023== by 0x40106B9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72)
==19023== by 0x40107CA: call_init (dl-init.c:30)
==19023== by 0x40107CA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120)
==19023== by 0x4000C69: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so)
==19023== by 0x2: ???
==19023== by 0xFFF0006A2: ???
==19023== by 0xFFF0006B8: ???
==19023== by 0xFFF0006CF: ???
==19023==
==19023== LEAK SUMMARY:
==19023== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==19023== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==19023== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==19023== still reachable: 73,632 bytes in 5 blocks
==19023== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==19023==
==19023== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==19023== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
```
Tree-SHA512: 38b6552736a5710a42dbad770c490583cfc762acbec716f5db4cf38314f494ea99430713ea407c73b49d867676ced221a282437f3fcfd8346f8f68386f4fc74d
b82c55a Add attribute [[noreturn]] (C++11) to functions that will not return (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add attribute `[[noreturn]]` (C++11) to functions that will not return.
Rationale:
* Reduce the number of false positives/false negatives from static analyzers with regards to things such as unused or unreachable code
* Potentially enable additional compiler optimizations
Tree-SHA512: 899683fe8b2fcf19bd334352271d368b46b805be9d426aac1808335fd95732d6d7078d3296951b9879196f3f6e3ec0fdb7695d0afdc3fbe4dd78a2ca70e91ff7
360b464 Comments: More comments on functions/globals in standard.h. (Jim Posen)
Pull request description:
I was confused about what "data carrier" meant, so I wanted to comment the `fAcceptDatacarrier` and `nMaxDatacarrierBytes` fields specifically. Then I figured I'd add docs for the rest of the functions.
Tree-SHA512: e6d0cfe6f4a2ab52ae76f984b1f5d8de371ae938e7832be8b02517d868f1caea62fec8888c917a2bd3d8ef74025de7f00dc96923fa56436dc6b190626652bf29
Wladimir J. van der Laan