Segwit's version bit will be signalled for all invocations of CreateNewBlock,
and not specifying segwit only will cause CreateNewBlock to skip transactions
with witness from being selected.
Github-Pull: #9955
Rebased-From: abe7b3d3ab
Send payments during the test from a different node than the node generating
keys to be imported, so the spending node doesn't create transactions that
inadvertently involve (spend funds from) the imported keys.
Fixes#9826
Github-Pull: #9839
Rebased-From: 864890adf5
Get rid of partial functions so the test can be more easily extended to add
more variants of imports with options that affect rescanning (e.g. different
key timestamps).
Also change the second half of the test to send /to/ the imported addresses,
instead of /from/ the imported addresses. The goal of this part of the test was
to confirm that the wallet would pick up new transactions after an import
regardless of whether or not a rescan happened during the import. But because
the wallet can only do this reliably for incoming transactions and not outgoing
transactions (which require the wallet to look up transaction inputs) the test
previously was less meaningful than it should have been.
Fixes a bug in AcceptBlock() in invoking CheckBlock() with incorrect
arguments, and restores a call to CheckBlock() from ProcessNewBlock()
as belt-and-suspenders.
Updates the (overspecified) tests to match behavior.
This is certainly not exhaustive, but it's better than nothing. Adds checks
for:
- Any message received before sending a version
- Any message received other than version/reject before sending a verack
It also tries to goad the remote into sending a pong, address, or block
announcement.
When importing a watch-only address over importmulti with a specific timestamp,
the wallet's nTimeFirstKey is currently set to 1. After this change, the
provided timestamp will be used and stored as metadata associated with
watch-only key. This can improve wallet performance because it can avoid the
need to scan the entire blockchain for watch only addresses when timestamps are
provided.
Also adds timestamp to validateaddress return value (needed for tests).
Fixes#9034.
Additionally, accept a "now" timestamp, to allow avoiding rescans for keys
which are known never to have been used.
Note that the behavior when "now" is specified is slightly different than the
previous behavior when no timestamp was specified at all. Previously, when no
timestamp was specified, it would avoid rescanning during the importmulti call,
but set the key's nCreateTime value to 1, which would not prevent future block
reads in later ScanForWalletTransactions calls. With this change, passing a
"now" timestamp will set the key's nCreateTime to the current block time
instead of 1.
Fixes#9491
Make sure that RPC tests are actually checking failures correctly by:
- Catching JSON RPC exceptions and verifying the error codes and messages.
- Failing the test case if the JSON RPC exception isn't raised.
Preserve comment, order form, and account strings from the original wallet
transaction. Also set fTimeReceivedIsTxTime and fFromMe fields for consistency
with CWallet::CreateTransaction. The latter two fields don't influence current
wallet behavior, but do record that the transaction originated in the wallet
instead of coming from the network or sendrawtransaction.
This command allows a user to increase the fee on a wallet transaction T, creating a "bumper" transaction B.
T must signal that it is BIP-125 replaceable.
T's change output is decremented to pay the additional fee. (B will not add inputs to T.)
T cannot have any descendant transactions.
Once B bumps T, neither T nor B's outputs can be spent until either T or (more likely) B is mined.
Includes code by @jonasschnelli and @ryanofsky
Adds a qa testcase testing the new "-assumevalid" option. The testcase builds
a chain that includes and invalid signature for one of the transactions and
sends that chain to three nodes:
- node0 has no -assumevalid parameter and rejects the invalid chain.
- node1 has -assumevalid set and accepts the invalid chain.
- node2 has -assumevalid set but the invalid block is not buried deep
enough to assume invalid, and so rejects the invalid chain.
If node 0 is sufficiently fast to announce its block to node 1,
node 1 might already have the block by the time the
node_sync_via_rpc loop gets around to node 1, resulting in the
submitblock result "duplicate-inconclusive" as node 1 has the block,
but prefers an alternate chain.
Suhas Daftuar