Avoid static analyzer warnings regarding "Function call argument
is a pointer to uninitialized value" in cases where we are
intentionally using such arguments.
This is achieved by using ...
`f(b.begin(), b.end())` (`std::array<char, N>`)
... instead of ...
`f(b, b + N)` (`char b[N]`)
Rationale:
* Reduce false positives by guiding static analyzers regarding our
intentions.
Before this commit:
```
$ clang-tidy-3.5 -checks=* src/bench/base58.cpp
bench/base58.cpp:23:9: warning: Function call argument is a pointer to uninitialized value [clang-analyzer-core.CallAndMessage]
EncodeBase58(b, b + 32);
^
$ clang-tidy-3.5 -checks=* src/bench/verify_script.cpp
bench/verify_script.cpp:59:5: warning: Function call argument is a pointer to uninitialized value [clang-analyzer-core.CallAndMessage]
key.Set(vchKey, vchKey + 32, false);
^
$
```
After this commit:
```
$ clang-tidy-3.5 -checks=* src/bench/base58.cpp
$ clang-tidy-3.5 -checks=* src/bench/verify_script.cpp
$
```
This check has been moved to the wallet logic GetMinimumFee. The rpc call to
estimatesmartfee will now no longer return a result maxed with the mempool min
fee, but automated fee calculations from the wallet will produce the same result
as before and coincontrol and sendcoins dialogs in the GUI will correctly
display the right prospective fee.
changes to policy/fees.cpp include a big whitespace indentation change.
Remove helper function (CalculateEstimateType) for determining whether
estimates should be conservative or not, now that this is only called
once from GetMinimumFee and incorporate the logic directly there.
This fixes buggy behavior where we were temporarily setting and unsetting the
global payTxFee when trying to send a transaction with a custom fee from the
GUI. The previous behavior was inconsistent depending on the order of using the
RPC call settxfee and clicking various radio buttons in the sendcoinsdialog.
The new behavior is that transactions sent with the GUI will always use either
the smartfee slider value or the custom fee set on the GUI and they will not
affect the global defaults which are only for RPC and initial GUI values.
2aef1f182 [Qt] migrate old fee slider value to new dropbown Always round up (conservative) (Jonas Schnelli)
bc1be90e3 [Qt] replace fee slider with a Dropdown, extend conf. targets (Jonas Schnelli)
Tree-SHA512: 53796cf0b434dd3db5d4680dbeb6231a7df8f15d88187178fd4db8917cd7fc60091ce2c1589fd93668fc94bb13f989aba5b7ef3792fa95ee1f9f21a15709e2d3
dd97a529a Properly forbid -salvagewallet and -zapwallettxes for multi wallet. (Alex Morcos)
Tree-SHA512: dcde8f854ae957b4d3af4bcf1b811e0b6e9b93602764f86499e46a28d304cd4ee93ba058c03f6ca74ccb60e1310c83e53b698c64d93e5503115377655b80d44d
Warning from gcc 7.1 is ./prevector.h:450:25: warning:
'*((void*)(&<anonymous>)+8).prevector<28, unsigned char>::_union.prevector<28, unsigned char>::direct_or_indirect::<anonymous>.prevector<28, unsigned char>::direct_or_indirect::<unnamed struct>::indirect'
may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
Some people keep thinking that MAX_BLOCK_BASE_SIZE is a separate
size limit from the weight limit when it fact it is superfluous,
and used in early tests before the witness data has been
validated or just to compute worst case sizes. The size checks
that use it would not behave any differently consensus wise
if they were eliminated completely.
Its correct value is not independently settable but is a function
of the weight limit and weight formula.
This patch just eliminates it and uses the scale factor as
required to compute the worse case constants.
It also moves the weight factor out of primitives into consensus,
which is a more logical place for it.
18bacec6c Make check to distinguish between orphan txs and old txs more efficient. (Alex Morcos)
Tree-SHA512: b6b4bad89aa561975dce7b68b2fdad5623af5ebcb9c38fd6a72b5f6d0544ed441df4865591ac018f7ae0df9b5c60820cb4d9e55664f5667c9268458df70fd554
d34d77a build: verify that the assembler can handle crc32 functions (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
Also, enable crc32 even if -msse4.2 wasn't added by us, as long as it works. This allows custom flags (such as -march=native) to work as expected.
Addresses #10670.
Tree-SHA512: e1a41a87b078d270bc645814315b229ad9c16556a4d14fb66b27a65b28d0caf9bf324f8c1e221854992aa17f53466eece06faebbf74d59b3d4ff2e6db6c614a4
69a4339ef missing white space in function arg (Lawrence Nahum)
Pull request description:
Tree-SHA512: 94d832eca0b5429cf48c7c1d4489942b53182c5b7ad9f24264867e7631301173c23a48f7b2e8fd22ff1b3137bafacb3f9d4320f4df235668c9096aaefff7afe8
959dd8781 Avoid printing incorrect block indexing time due to uninitialized variable (practicalswift)
Tree-SHA512: a76e43c3ffa734ed5c7eadf363f345f268aa0e6ce775aba8f856fe3bbc82f240dc7c734c5ca3ac500a12eb41fae00623413e79f484d5acf809b6e400851d771d
Adding comment to assert in PartialMerkleTree::CalcHash()
Adding comment on CMerkleBlock indicating it calls something that contains an assert
Removing EOL whitespace
0f402b9 Fix rare edge case of paying too many fees when transaction has no change. (Alex Morcos)
253cd7e Only reserve key for scriptChange once in CreateTransaction (Alex Morcos)
Pull request description:
This is an alternative to #10333
See commit messages.
The first commit is mostly code move, it just moves the change creation code out of the loop.
@instagibbs
Tree-SHA512: f16287ae0f0c6f09cf8b1f0db5880bb567ffa74a50898e3d1ef549ba592c6309ae1a9b251739f63a8bb622d48f03ce2dff9e7a57a6bac4afb4b95b0a86613ea8
Due to the iterative process of selecting new coins in each loop a new fee is
calculated that needs to be met each time. In the typical case if the most
recent iteration of the loop produced a much smaller transaction and we have now
gathered inputs with too many fees, we can just reduce the change. However in
the case where there is no change output, it is possible to end up with a
transaction which drastically overpays fees. This commit addresses that case,
by creating a change output if the overpayment is large enough to support it,
this is accomplished by rerunning the transaction creation loop without
selecting new coins.
Thanks to instagibbs for working on this as well
475c08c Add PR description to merge commit in github-merge.py (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
There is often some context given in PR descriptions that is missing from commits, and it may be worthwhile to retain that information in our history in git. This PR adds that information to the merge commit when created through `github-merge.py`.
We should also encourage people to provide as much information as possible in the PR commits themselves, but I believe that is an orthogonal issue. Individual commits don't need to have a description of the overall goal of a PR.
Tree-SHA512: cbae46ec24ce911744e11a07e5d51895d3acc79659db306d8124304ef8e422bba99001ee2a741b08c92a5eb39d9c3f6b723622b20d6553ca5cfa0a8de866194c
5e3b7b5 Improve error reporting for estimaterawfee (Alex Morcos)
1fafd70 Add function to report highest estimate target tracked per horizon (Alex Morcos)
9c85b91 Change API to estimaterawfee (Alex Morcos)
Tree-SHA512: e624c6e7967e9e48abe49f5818bd674e5710e571cc093029d2f90d39fdfba3c1f30e83bf89f6dce97052b59a7d9636a64642ccfb26effd149c417d0afbed0c0b
11ba8e9 [tests] rename getblocktemplate_proposals.py to mining.py (John Newbery)
b29dd41 [tests] add test for submit block (John Newbery)
9bf0d80 [tests] run successful test in getblocktemplate first (John Newbery)
82dc597 [tests] don't build blocks manually in getblocktemplate test (John Newbery)
f82c709 [tests] clarify assertions in getblocktemplate test (John Newbery)
66c570a [tests] Don't build the coinbase manually in getblocktemplate test (John Newbery)
38b38cd [tests] getblocktemplate_proposals.py: add logging (John Newbery)
0a3a5ff [tests] Fix flake8 warnings in getblocktemplate tests (John Newbery)
32cffe6 [tests] Fix import order in getblocktemplate test (John Newbery)
Tree-SHA512: a51a57314fa1c4c4b8a7896492ec6e677b6bed12387060def34a62e9dfbee7961f71bb5553fbd70028be61ae32eccf13fd255fa9651f908e9a5e64c28f43f00e
That OP_NOP10 is the last executable opcode is a bit of a obscure trivia, and the MAX_OPCODE constant already exists. This merely standardizes use of MAX_OPCODE over OP_NOP10 where it makes sense and is more clear.
Pieter Wuille