These are (afaik) all long-standing races or concurrent accesses. Going
forward, we can clean these up so that they're not all individual atomic
accesses.
- Reintroduce cs_vRecv to guard receive-specific vars
- Lock vRecv/vSend for CNodeStats
- Make some vars atomic.
- Only set the connection time in CNode's constructor so that it doesn't change
The initialization order of global data structures in different
implementation units is undefined. Making use of this is essentially
gambling on what the linker does, the so-called [Static initialization
order fiasco](https://isocpp.org/wiki/faq/ctors#static-init-order).
In this case it apparently worked on Linux but failed on OpenBSD and
FreeBSD.
To create it on first use, make the registration structure local to
a function.
Fixes#8910.
Preserve comment, order form, and account strings from the original wallet
transaction. Also set fTimeReceivedIsTxTime and fFromMe fields for consistency
with CWallet::CreateTransaction. The latter two fields don't influence current
wallet behavior, but do record that the transaction originated in the wallet
instead of coming from the network or sendrawtransaction.
This silently skips trying to merge signatures from inputs which
do not exist from transactions provided to signrawtransaction,
instead of hitting an assert.
Since ForEach* are can be used to send messages to all nodes, the caller may
end up sending a message before the version handshake is complete. To limit
this, filter out these nodes. While we're at it, may as well filter out
disconnected nodes as well.
Delete unused methods rather than updating them.
This avoids having some vars set if the version negotiation fails.
Also copy it all into CNode at the same site. nVersion and
fSuccessfullyConnected are set last, as they are the gates for the other vars.
Make them atomic for that reason.
Once the CNode has been added to vNodes, it is possible that it is
disconnected+deleted in the socket handler thread. However, after
that we now call InitializeNode, which accesses the pnode.
helgrind managed to tickle this case (somehow), but I suspect it
requires in immensely braindead scheduler.
More accurate than simply adding one byte per input, and properly handles the
case where the original transaction happened to have very small signatures
The result value indicates the actual fee on the transaction that was replaced. But there is an error message which uses the description 'oldfee' to refer to the original fee rate applied to the new transaction's estimated max size. It was confusing that two different uses of 'oldfee' had two different numeric values.