From ff3a21919d97f7500978b4160199336e4b50b36a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matt Corallo Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 21:29:46 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Call RewindBlockIndex even if we're about to run -reindex-chainstate RewindBlockIndex works over both chainActive - disconnecting blocks from the tip that need witness verification - and mapBlockIndex - requiring redownload of blocks missing witness data. It should never have been the case that the second half is skipped if we're about to run -reindex-chainstate. --- src/init.cpp | 5 ++++- src/validation.cpp | 17 +++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/init.cpp b/src/init.cpp index 8fec69c2b..2ea778a5b 100644 --- a/src/init.cpp +++ b/src/init.cpp @@ -1452,7 +1452,10 @@ bool AppInitMain(boost::thread_group& threadGroup, CScheduler& scheduler) assert(chainActive.Tip() != NULL); } - if (!fReindex && chainActive.Tip() != NULL) { + if (!fReindex) { + // Note that RewindBlockIndex MUST run even if we're about to -reindex-chainstate. + // It both disconnects blocks based on chainActive, and drops block data in + // mapBlockIndex based on lack of available witness data. uiInterface.InitMessage(_("Rewinding blocks...")); if (!RewindBlockIndex(chainparams)) { strLoadError = _("Unable to rewind the database to a pre-fork state. You will need to redownload the blockchain"); diff --git a/src/validation.cpp b/src/validation.cpp index 91982ead9..7ec77406e 100644 --- a/src/validation.cpp +++ b/src/validation.cpp @@ -3763,6 +3763,8 @@ bool RewindBlockIndex(const CChainParams& params) { LOCK(cs_main); + // Note that during -reindex-chainstate we are called with an empty chainActive! + int nHeight = 1; while (nHeight <= chainActive.Height()) { if (IsWitnessEnabled(chainActive[nHeight - 1], params.GetConsensus()) && !(chainActive[nHeight]->nStatus & BLOCK_OPT_WITNESS)) { @@ -3832,12 +3834,19 @@ bool RewindBlockIndex(const CChainParams& params) } } - PruneBlockIndexCandidates(); + if (chainActive.Tip() != NULL) { + // We can't prune block index candidates based on our tip if we have + // no tip due to chainActive being empty! + PruneBlockIndexCandidates(); - CheckBlockIndex(params.GetConsensus()); + CheckBlockIndex(params.GetConsensus()); - if (!FlushStateToDisk(params, state, FLUSH_STATE_ALWAYS)) { - return false; + // FlushStateToDisk can possibly read chainActive. Be conservative + // and skip it here, we're about to -reindex-chainstate anyway, so + // it'll get called a bunch real soon. + if (!FlushStateToDisk(params, state, FLUSH_STATE_ALWAYS)) { + return false; + } } return true;