Browse Source

Tests: Edit bloated varint test and add option for 'barely expensive' tests

0.13
mrbandrews 9 years ago
parent
commit
ff2dcf274d
  1. 98
      qa/rpc-tests/p2p-fullblocktest.py

98
qa/rpc-tests/p2p-fullblocktest.py

@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ class FullBlockTest(ComparisonTestFramework): @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ class FullBlockTest(ComparisonTestFramework):
self.tip = None
self.blocks = {}
def add_options(self, parser):
super().add_options(parser)
parser.add_option("--runbarelyexpensive", dest="runbarelyexpensive", default=True)
def run_test(self):
self.test = TestManager(self, self.options.tmpdir)
self.test.add_all_connections(self.nodes)
@ -875,10 +879,13 @@ class FullBlockTest(ComparisonTestFramework): @@ -875,10 +879,13 @@ class FullBlockTest(ComparisonTestFramework):
yield rejected(RejectResult(16, b'bad-txns-nonfinal'))
# This checks that a block with a bloated VARINT between the block_header and the array of tx is rejected
# (previous behavior was that it was accepted.) It also checks that if you subsequently send that block
# with correct encoding, it should be accepted (i.e., the receiving node should not reject it on the
# basis that it's the same as an already-rejected block, which would be a DoS vulnerability.)
# This checks that a block with a bloated VARINT between the block_header and the array of tx such that
# the block is > MAX_BLOCK_SIZE with the bloated varint, but <= MAX_BLOCK_SIZE without the bloated varint,
# does not cause a subsequent, identical block with canonical encoding to be rejected. The test does not
# care whether the bloated block is accepted or rejected; it only cares that the second block is accepted.
#
# What matters is that the receiving node should not reject the bloated block, and then reject the canonical
# block on the basis that it's the same as an already-rejected block (which would be a consensus failure.)
#
# -> b39 (11) -> b42 (12) -> b43 (13) -> b53 (14) -> b55 (15) -> b57 (16) -> b60 (17) -> b64 (18)
# \
@ -903,7 +910,7 @@ class FullBlockTest(ComparisonTestFramework): @@ -903,7 +910,7 @@ class FullBlockTest(ComparisonTestFramework):
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(b64a.vtx[1].sha256, 0)))
b64a = update_block("64a", [tx])
assert_equal(len(b64a.serialize()), MAX_BLOCK_SIZE + 8)
yield rejected()
yield TestInstance([[self.tip, None]])
# comptool workaround: to make sure b64 is delivered, manually erase b64a from blockstore
self.test.block_store.erase(b64a.sha256)
@ -941,7 +948,6 @@ class FullBlockTest(ComparisonTestFramework): @@ -941,7 +948,6 @@ class FullBlockTest(ComparisonTestFramework):
update_block(66, [tx2, tx1])
yield rejected(RejectResult(16, b'bad-txns-inputs-missingorspent'))
# Attempt to double-spend a transaction created in a block
#
# -> b43 (13) -> b53 (14) -> b55 (15) -> b57 (16) -> b60 (17) -> b64 (18) -> b65 (19)
@ -1239,46 +1245,48 @@ class FullBlockTest(ComparisonTestFramework): @@ -1239,46 +1245,48 @@ class FullBlockTest(ComparisonTestFramework):
# Test re-org of a week's worth of blocks (1088 blocks)
# This test takes a minute or two and can be accomplished in memory
#
tip(88)
LARGE_REORG_SIZE = 1088
test1 = TestInstance(sync_every_block=False)
spend=out[32]
for i in range(89, LARGE_REORG_SIZE + 89):
b = block(i, spend)
tx = CTransaction()
script_length = MAX_BLOCK_SIZE - len(b.serialize()) - 69
script_output = CScript([b'\x00' * script_length])
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(0, script_output))
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(b.vtx[1].sha256, 0)))
b = update_block(i, [tx])
assert_equal(len(b.serialize()), MAX_BLOCK_SIZE)
test1.blocks_and_transactions.append([self.tip, True])
save_spendable_output()
spend = get_spendable_output()
yield test1
chain1_tip = i
# now create alt chain of same length
tip(88)
test2 = TestInstance(sync_every_block=False)
for i in range(89, LARGE_REORG_SIZE + 89):
block("alt"+str(i))
test2.blocks_and_transactions.append([self.tip, False])
yield test2
# extend alt chain to trigger re-org
block("alt" + str(chain1_tip + 1))
yield accepted()
# ... and re-org back to the first chain
tip(chain1_tip)
block(chain1_tip + 1)
yield rejected()
block(chain1_tip + 2)
yield accepted()
if self.options.runbarelyexpensive:
tip(88)
LARGE_REORG_SIZE = 1088
test1 = TestInstance(sync_every_block=False)
spend=out[32]
for i in range(89, LARGE_REORG_SIZE + 89):
b = block(i, spend)
tx = CTransaction()
script_length = MAX_BLOCK_SIZE - len(b.serialize()) - 69
script_output = CScript([b'\x00' * script_length])
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(0, script_output))
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(b.vtx[1].sha256, 0)))
b = update_block(i, [tx])
assert_equal(len(b.serialize()), MAX_BLOCK_SIZE)
test1.blocks_and_transactions.append([self.tip, True])
save_spendable_output()
spend = get_spendable_output()
yield test1
chain1_tip = i
# now create alt chain of same length
tip(88)
test2 = TestInstance(sync_every_block=False)
for i in range(89, LARGE_REORG_SIZE + 89):
block("alt"+str(i))
test2.blocks_and_transactions.append([self.tip, False])
yield test2
# extend alt chain to trigger re-org
block("alt" + str(chain1_tip + 1))
yield accepted()
# ... and re-org back to the first chain
tip(chain1_tip)
block(chain1_tip + 1)
yield rejected()
block(chain1_tip + 2)
yield accepted()
chain1_tip += 2
chain1_tip += 2
if __name__ == '__main__':

Loading…
Cancel
Save