mirror of
https://github.com/kvazar-network/kevacoin.git
synced 2025-03-10 04:31:07 +00:00
Merge #9674: Always enforce strict lock ordering (try or not)
618ee92 Further-enforce lockordering by enforcing directly after TRY_LOCKs (Matt Corallo) 2a962d4 Fixup style a bit by moving { to the same line as if statements (Matt Corallo) 8465631 Always enforce lock strict lock ordering (try or not) (Matt Corallo) fd13eca Lock cs_vSend and cs_inventory in a consistent order even in TRY (Matt Corallo)
This commit is contained in:
commit
dd163f5788
18
src/net.cpp
18
src/net.cpp
@ -1093,20 +1093,18 @@ void CConnman::ThreadSocketHandler()
|
|||||||
BOOST_FOREACH(CNode* pnode, vNodesDisconnectedCopy)
|
BOOST_FOREACH(CNode* pnode, vNodesDisconnectedCopy)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
// wait until threads are done using it
|
// wait until threads are done using it
|
||||||
if (pnode->GetRefCount() <= 0)
|
if (pnode->GetRefCount() <= 0) {
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
bool fDelete = false;
|
bool fDelete = false;
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
TRY_LOCK(pnode->cs_vSend, lockSend);
|
TRY_LOCK(pnode->cs_inventory, lockInv);
|
||||||
if (lockSend)
|
if (lockInv) {
|
||||||
{
|
TRY_LOCK(pnode->cs_vSend, lockSend);
|
||||||
TRY_LOCK(pnode->cs_inventory, lockInv);
|
if (lockSend) {
|
||||||
if (lockInv)
|
fDelete = true;
|
||||||
fDelete = true;
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if (fDelete)
|
if (fDelete) {
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
vNodesDisconnected.remove(pnode);
|
vNodesDisconnected.remove(pnode);
|
||||||
DeleteNode(pnode);
|
DeleteNode(pnode);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
50
src/sync.cpp
50
src/sync.cpp
@ -77,52 +77,28 @@ boost::thread_specific_ptr<LockStack> lockstack;
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
static void potential_deadlock_detected(const std::pair<void*, void*>& mismatch, const LockStack& s1, const LockStack& s2)
|
static void potential_deadlock_detected(const std::pair<void*, void*>& mismatch, const LockStack& s1, const LockStack& s2)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
// We attempt to not assert on probably-not deadlocks by assuming that
|
|
||||||
// a try lock will immediately have otherwise bailed if it had
|
|
||||||
// failed to get the lock
|
|
||||||
// We do this by, for the locks which triggered the potential deadlock,
|
|
||||||
// in either lockorder, checking that the second of the two which is locked
|
|
||||||
// is only a TRY_LOCK, ignoring locks if they are reentrant.
|
|
||||||
bool firstLocked = false;
|
|
||||||
bool secondLocked = false;
|
|
||||||
bool onlyMaybeDeadlock = false;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
LogPrintf("POTENTIAL DEADLOCK DETECTED\n");
|
LogPrintf("POTENTIAL DEADLOCK DETECTED\n");
|
||||||
LogPrintf("Previous lock order was:\n");
|
LogPrintf("Previous lock order was:\n");
|
||||||
BOOST_FOREACH (const PAIRTYPE(void*, CLockLocation) & i, s2) {
|
BOOST_FOREACH (const PAIRTYPE(void*, CLockLocation) & i, s2) {
|
||||||
if (i.first == mismatch.first) {
|
if (i.first == mismatch.first) {
|
||||||
LogPrintf(" (1)");
|
LogPrintf(" (1)");
|
||||||
if (!firstLocked && secondLocked && i.second.fTry)
|
|
||||||
onlyMaybeDeadlock = true;
|
|
||||||
firstLocked = true;
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if (i.first == mismatch.second) {
|
if (i.first == mismatch.second) {
|
||||||
LogPrintf(" (2)");
|
LogPrintf(" (2)");
|
||||||
if (!secondLocked && firstLocked && i.second.fTry)
|
|
||||||
onlyMaybeDeadlock = true;
|
|
||||||
secondLocked = true;
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
LogPrintf(" %s\n", i.second.ToString());
|
LogPrintf(" %s\n", i.second.ToString());
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
firstLocked = false;
|
|
||||||
secondLocked = false;
|
|
||||||
LogPrintf("Current lock order is:\n");
|
LogPrintf("Current lock order is:\n");
|
||||||
BOOST_FOREACH (const PAIRTYPE(void*, CLockLocation) & i, s1) {
|
BOOST_FOREACH (const PAIRTYPE(void*, CLockLocation) & i, s1) {
|
||||||
if (i.first == mismatch.first) {
|
if (i.first == mismatch.first) {
|
||||||
LogPrintf(" (1)");
|
LogPrintf(" (1)");
|
||||||
if (!firstLocked && secondLocked && i.second.fTry)
|
|
||||||
onlyMaybeDeadlock = true;
|
|
||||||
firstLocked = true;
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if (i.first == mismatch.second) {
|
if (i.first == mismatch.second) {
|
||||||
LogPrintf(" (2)");
|
LogPrintf(" (2)");
|
||||||
if (!secondLocked && firstLocked && i.second.fTry)
|
|
||||||
onlyMaybeDeadlock = true;
|
|
||||||
secondLocked = true;
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
LogPrintf(" %s\n", i.second.ToString());
|
LogPrintf(" %s\n", i.second.ToString());
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
assert(onlyMaybeDeadlock);
|
assert(false);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static void push_lock(void* c, const CLockLocation& locklocation, bool fTry)
|
static void push_lock(void* c, const CLockLocation& locklocation, bool fTry)
|
||||||
@ -134,21 +110,19 @@ static void push_lock(void* c, const CLockLocation& locklocation, bool fTry)
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
(*lockstack).push_back(std::make_pair(c, locklocation));
|
(*lockstack).push_back(std::make_pair(c, locklocation));
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!fTry) {
|
BOOST_FOREACH (const PAIRTYPE(void*, CLockLocation) & i, (*lockstack)) {
|
||||||
BOOST_FOREACH (const PAIRTYPE(void*, CLockLocation) & i, (*lockstack)) {
|
if (i.first == c)
|
||||||
if (i.first == c)
|
break;
|
||||||
break;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
std::pair<void*, void*> p1 = std::make_pair(i.first, c);
|
std::pair<void*, void*> p1 = std::make_pair(i.first, c);
|
||||||
if (lockdata.lockorders.count(p1))
|
if (lockdata.lockorders.count(p1))
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
lockdata.lockorders[p1] = (*lockstack);
|
lockdata.lockorders[p1] = (*lockstack);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
std::pair<void*, void*> p2 = std::make_pair(c, i.first);
|
std::pair<void*, void*> p2 = std::make_pair(c, i.first);
|
||||||
lockdata.invlockorders.insert(p2);
|
lockdata.invlockorders.insert(p2);
|
||||||
if (lockdata.lockorders.count(p2))
|
if (lockdata.lockorders.count(p2))
|
||||||
potential_deadlock_detected(p1, lockdata.lockorders[p2], lockdata.lockorders[p1]);
|
potential_deadlock_detected(p1, lockdata.lockorders[p2], lockdata.lockorders[p1]);
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user