|
|
@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ |
|
|
|
RPCs tested are: |
|
|
|
RPCs tested are: |
|
|
|
- getaccountaddress |
|
|
|
- getaccountaddress |
|
|
|
- getaddressesbyaccount |
|
|
|
- getaddressesbyaccount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- listaddressgroupings |
|
|
|
- setaccount |
|
|
|
- setaccount |
|
|
|
- sendfrom (with account arguments) |
|
|
|
- sendfrom (with account arguments) |
|
|
|
- move (with account arguments) |
|
|
|
- move (with account arguments) |
|
|
@ -35,10 +36,51 @@ class WalletAccountsTest(BitcoinTestFramework): |
|
|
|
# Check that there's no UTXO on any of the nodes |
|
|
|
# Check that there's no UTXO on any of the nodes |
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(node.listunspent()), 0) |
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(node.listunspent()), 0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Note each time we call generate, all generated coins go into |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# the same address, so we call twice to get two addresses w/50 each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
node.generate(1) |
|
|
|
node.generate(101) |
|
|
|
node.generate(101) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(node.getbalance(), 100) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# there should be 2 address groups |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# each with 1 address with a balance of 50 Bitcoins |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
address_groups = node.listaddressgroupings() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(address_groups), 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# the addresses aren't linked now, but will be after we send to the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# common address |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
linked_addresses = set() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for address_group in address_groups: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(address_group), 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(address_group[0]), 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(address_group[0][1], 50) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
linked_addresses.add(address_group[0][0]) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# send 50 from each address to a third address not in this wallet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# There's some fee that will come back to us when the miner reward |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# matures. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
common_address = "msf4WtN1YQKXvNtvdFYt9JBnUD2FB41kjr" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
txid = node.sendmany( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fromaccount="", |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amounts={common_address: 100}, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subtractfeefrom=[common_address], |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
minconf=1, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tx_details = node.gettransaction(txid) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fee = -tx_details['details'][0]['fee'] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# there should be 1 address group, with the previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# unlinked addresses now linked (they both have 0 balance) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
address_groups = node.listaddressgroupings() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(address_groups), 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(address_groups[0]), 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(set([a[0] for a in address_groups[0]]), linked_addresses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal([a[1] for a in address_groups[0]], [0, 0]) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(node.getbalance(), 50) |
|
|
|
node.generate(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# we want to reset so that the "" account has what's expected. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# otherwise we're off by exactly the fee amount as that's mined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# and matures in the next 100 blocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
node.sendfrom("", common_address, fee) |
|
|
|
accounts = ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e"] |
|
|
|
accounts = ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e"] |
|
|
|
amount_to_send = 1.0 |
|
|
|
amount_to_send = 1.0 |
|
|
|
account_addresses = dict() |
|
|
|
account_addresses = dict() |
|
|
|