Browse Source

doc: Correct AmountFromValue/ValueFromAmount names

0.15
Wladimir J. van der Laan 7 years ago
parent
commit
dac37823d4
  1. 4
      doc/developer-notes.md

4
doc/developer-notes.md

@ -561,10 +561,10 @@ A few guidelines for introducing and reviewing new RPC interfaces: @@ -561,10 +561,10 @@ A few guidelines for introducing and reviewing new RPC interfaces:
which is error prone, and it is easy to get things such as escaping wrong.
JSON already supports nested data structures, no need to re-invent the wheel.
- *Exception*: AmountToValue can parse amounts as string. This was introduced because many JSON
- *Exception*: AmountFromValue can parse amounts as string. This was introduced because many JSON
parsers and formatters hard-code handling decimal numbers as floating point
values, resulting in potential loss of precision. This is unacceptable for
monetary values. **Always** use `AmountToValue` and `ValueToAmount` when
monetary values. **Always** use `AmountFromValue` and `ValueFromAmount` when
inputting or outputting monetary values. The only exceptions to this are
`prioritisetransaction` and `getblocktemplate` because their interface
is specified as-is in BIP22.

Loading…
Cancel
Save