Browse Source

Merge #9208: Improve DisconnectTip performance

c1235e3 Add RecursiveDynamicUsage overload for std::shared_ptr (Russell Yanofsky)
71f1903 Store disconnected block transactions outside mempool during reorg (Suhas Daftuar)
9decd64 [qa] Relax assumptions on mempool behavior during reorg (Suhas Daftuar)

Tree-SHA512: c160ad853a5cd060d0307af7606a0c77907497ed7033c9599b95e73d83f68fdfcd4214bd8a83db1c5b7a58022722b9de1ed2e6ea2e02f38a7b6c717f079dd0c6
0.15
Wladimir J. van der Laan 8 years ago
parent
commit
acd9957b72
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 1E4AED62986CD25D
  1. 5
      src/core_memusage.h
  2. 2
      src/txmempool.cpp
  3. 99
      src/txmempool.h
  4. 125
      src/validation.cpp
  5. 2
      src/validation.h
  6. 15
      test/functional/pruning.py

5
src/core_memusage.h

@ -63,4 +63,9 @@ static inline size_t RecursiveDynamicUsage(const CBlockLocator& locator) { @@ -63,4 +63,9 @@ static inline size_t RecursiveDynamicUsage(const CBlockLocator& locator) {
return memusage::DynamicUsage(locator.vHave);
}
template<typename X>
static inline size_t RecursiveDynamicUsage(const std::shared_ptr<X>& p) {
return p ? memusage::DynamicUsage(p) + RecursiveDynamicUsage(*p) : 0;
}
#endif // BITCOIN_CORE_MEMUSAGE_H

2
src/txmempool.cpp

@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ CTxMemPoolEntry::CTxMemPoolEntry(const CTransactionRef& _tx, const CAmount& _nFe @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ CTxMemPoolEntry::CTxMemPoolEntry(const CTransactionRef& _tx, const CAmount& _nFe
spendsCoinbase(_spendsCoinbase), sigOpCost(_sigOpsCost), lockPoints(lp)
{
nTxWeight = GetTransactionWeight(*tx);
nUsageSize = RecursiveDynamicUsage(*tx) + memusage::DynamicUsage(tx);
nUsageSize = RecursiveDynamicUsage(tx);
nCountWithDescendants = 1;
nSizeWithDescendants = GetTxSize();

99
src/txmempool.h

@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#include "boost/multi_index_container.hpp"
#include "boost/multi_index/ordered_index.hpp"
#include "boost/multi_index/hashed_index.hpp"
#include <boost/multi_index/sequenced_index.hpp>
#include <boost/signals2/signal.hpp>
@ -185,7 +186,7 @@ private: @@ -185,7 +186,7 @@ private:
const LockPoints& lp;
};
// extracts a TxMemPoolEntry's transaction hash
// extracts a transaction hash from CTxMempoolEntry or CTransactionRef
struct mempoolentry_txid
{
typedef uint256 result_type;
@ -193,6 +194,11 @@ struct mempoolentry_txid @@ -193,6 +194,11 @@ struct mempoolentry_txid
{
return entry.GetTx().GetHash();
}
result_type operator() (const CTransactionRef& tx) const
{
return tx->GetHash();
}
};
/** \class CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore
@ -662,4 +668,95 @@ public: @@ -662,4 +668,95 @@ public:
bool HaveCoins(const uint256 &txid) const;
};
/**
* DisconnectedBlockTransactions
* During the reorg, it's desirable to re-add previously confirmed transactions
* to the mempool, so that anything not re-confirmed in the new chain is
* available to be mined. However, it's more efficient to wait until the reorg
* is complete and process all still-unconfirmed transactions at that time,
* since we expect most confirmed transactions to (typically) still be
* confirmed in the new chain, and re-accepting to the memory pool is expensive
* (and therefore better to not do in the middle of reorg-processing).
* Instead, store the disconnected transactions (in order!) as we go, remove any
* that are included in blocks in the new chain, and then process the remaining
* still-unconfirmed transactions at the end.
*/
// multi_index tag names
struct txid_index {};
struct insertion_order {};
struct DisconnectedBlockTransactions {
typedef boost::multi_index_container<
CTransactionRef,
boost::multi_index::indexed_by<
// sorted by txid
boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<
boost::multi_index::tag<txid_index>,
mempoolentry_txid,
SaltedTxidHasher
>,
// sorted by order in the blockchain
boost::multi_index::sequenced<
boost::multi_index::tag<insertion_order>
>
>
> indexed_disconnected_transactions;
// It's almost certainly a logic bug if we don't clear out queuedTx before
// destruction, as we add to it while disconnecting blocks, and then we
// need to re-process remaining transactions to ensure mempool consistency.
// For now, assert() that we've emptied out this object on destruction.
// This assert() can always be removed if the reorg-processing code were
// to be refactored such that this assumption is no longer true (for
// instance if there was some other way we cleaned up the mempool after a
// reorg, besides draining this object).
~DisconnectedBlockTransactions() { assert(queuedTx.empty()); }
indexed_disconnected_transactions queuedTx;
uint64_t cachedInnerUsage = 0;
// Estimate the overhead of queuedTx to be 6 pointers + an allocation, as
// no exact formula for boost::multi_index_contained is implemented.
size_t DynamicMemoryUsage() const {
return memusage::MallocUsage(sizeof(CTransactionRef) + 6 * sizeof(void*)) * queuedTx.size() + cachedInnerUsage;
}
void addTransaction(const CTransactionRef& tx)
{
queuedTx.insert(tx);
cachedInnerUsage += RecursiveDynamicUsage(tx);
}
// Remove entries based on txid_index, and update memory usage.
void removeForBlock(const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& vtx)
{
// Short-circuit in the common case of a block being added to the tip
if (queuedTx.empty()) {
return;
}
for (auto const &tx : vtx) {
auto it = queuedTx.find(tx->GetHash());
if (it != queuedTx.end()) {
cachedInnerUsage -= RecursiveDynamicUsage(*it);
queuedTx.erase(it);
}
}
}
// Remove an entry by insertion_order index, and update memory usage.
void removeEntry(indexed_disconnected_transactions::index<insertion_order>::type::iterator entry)
{
cachedInnerUsage -= RecursiveDynamicUsage(*entry);
queuedTx.get<insertion_order>().erase(entry);
}
void clear()
{
cachedInnerUsage = 0;
queuedTx.clear();
}
};
#endif // BITCOIN_TXMEMPOOL_H

125
src/validation.cpp

@ -342,6 +342,56 @@ static bool IsCurrentForFeeEstimation() @@ -342,6 +342,56 @@ static bool IsCurrentForFeeEstimation()
return true;
}
/* Make mempool consistent after a reorg, by re-adding or recursively erasing
* disconnected block transactions from the mempool, and also removing any
* other transactions from the mempool that are no longer valid given the new
* tip/height.
*
* Note: we assume that disconnectpool only contains transactions that are NOT
* confirmed in the current chain nor already in the mempool (otherwise,
* in-mempool descendants of such transactions would be removed).
*
* Passing fAddToMempool=false will skip trying to add the transactions back,
* and instead just erase from the mempool as needed.
*/
void UpdateMempoolForReorg(DisconnectedBlockTransactions &disconnectpool, bool fAddToMempool)
{
AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
std::vector<uint256> vHashUpdate;
// disconnectpool's insertion_order index sorts the entries from
// oldest to newest, but the oldest entry will be the last tx from the
// latest mined block that was disconnected.
// Iterate disconnectpool in reverse, so that we add transactions
// back to the mempool starting with the earliest transaction that had
// been previously seen in a block.
auto it = disconnectpool.queuedTx.get<insertion_order>().rbegin();
while (it != disconnectpool.queuedTx.get<insertion_order>().rend()) {
// ignore validation errors in resurrected transactions
CValidationState stateDummy;
if (!fAddToMempool || (*it)->IsCoinBase() || !AcceptToMemoryPool(mempool, stateDummy, *it, false, NULL, NULL, true)) {
// If the transaction doesn't make it in to the mempool, remove any
// transactions that depend on it (which would now be orphans).
mempool.removeRecursive(**it, MemPoolRemovalReason::REORG);
} else if (mempool.exists((*it)->GetHash())) {
vHashUpdate.push_back((*it)->GetHash());
}
++it;
}
disconnectpool.queuedTx.clear();
// AcceptToMemoryPool/addUnchecked all assume that new mempool entries have
// no in-mempool children, which is generally not true when adding
// previously-confirmed transactions back to the mempool.
// UpdateTransactionsFromBlock finds descendants of any transactions in
// the disconnectpool that were added back and cleans up the mempool state.
mempool.UpdateTransactionsFromBlock(vHashUpdate);
// We also need to remove any now-immature transactions
mempool.removeForReorg(pcoinsTip, chainActive.Tip()->nHeight + 1, STANDARD_LOCKTIME_VERIFY_FLAGS);
// Re-limit mempool size, in case we added any transactions
LimitMempoolSize(mempool, GetArg("-maxmempool", DEFAULT_MAX_MEMPOOL_SIZE) * 1000000, GetArg("-mempoolexpiry", DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_EXPIRY) * 60 * 60);
}
bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState& state, const CTransactionRef& ptx, bool fLimitFree,
bool* pfMissingInputs, int64_t nAcceptTime, std::list<CTransactionRef>* plTxnReplaced,
bool fOverrideMempoolLimit, const CAmount& nAbsurdFee, std::vector<uint256>& vHashTxnToUncache)
@ -1877,8 +1927,17 @@ void static UpdateTip(CBlockIndex *pindexNew, const CChainParams& chainParams) { @@ -1877,8 +1927,17 @@ void static UpdateTip(CBlockIndex *pindexNew, const CChainParams& chainParams) {
}
/** Disconnect chainActive's tip. You probably want to call mempool.removeForReorg and manually re-limit mempool size after this, with cs_main held. */
bool static DisconnectTip(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, bool fBare = false)
/** Disconnect chainActive's tip.
* After calling, the mempool will be in an inconsistent state, with
* transactions from disconnected blocks being added to disconnectpool. You
* should make the mempool consistent again by calling UpdateMempoolForReorg.
* with cs_main held.
*
* If disconnectpool is NULL, then no disconnected transactions are added to
* disconnectpool (note that the caller is responsible for mempool consistency
* in any case).
*/
bool static DisconnectTip(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, DisconnectedBlockTransactions *disconnectpool)
{
CBlockIndex *pindexDelete = chainActive.Tip();
assert(pindexDelete);
@ -1901,25 +1960,17 @@ bool static DisconnectTip(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainpara @@ -1901,25 +1960,17 @@ bool static DisconnectTip(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainpara
if (!FlushStateToDisk(state, FLUSH_STATE_IF_NEEDED))
return false;
if (!fBare) {
// Resurrect mempool transactions from the disconnected block.
std::vector<uint256> vHashUpdate;
for (const auto& it : block.vtx) {
const CTransaction& tx = *it;
// ignore validation errors in resurrected transactions
CValidationState stateDummy;
if (tx.IsCoinBase() || !AcceptToMemoryPool(mempool, stateDummy, it, false, NULL, NULL, true)) {
mempool.removeRecursive(tx, MemPoolRemovalReason::REORG);
} else if (mempool.exists(tx.GetHash())) {
vHashUpdate.push_back(tx.GetHash());
}
if (disconnectpool) {
// Save transactions to re-add to mempool at end of reorg
for (auto it = block.vtx.rbegin(); it != block.vtx.rend(); ++it) {
disconnectpool->addTransaction(*it);
}
while (disconnectpool->DynamicMemoryUsage() > MAX_DISCONNECTED_TX_POOL_SIZE * 1000) {
// Drop the earliest entry, and remove its children from the mempool.
auto it = disconnectpool->queuedTx.get<insertion_order>().begin();
mempool.removeRecursive(**it, MemPoolRemovalReason::REORG);
disconnectpool->removeEntry(it);
}
// AcceptToMemoryPool/addUnchecked all assume that new mempool entries have
// no in-mempool children, which is generally not true when adding
// previously-confirmed transactions back to the mempool.
// UpdateTransactionsFromBlock finds descendants of any transactions in this
// block that were added back and cleans up the mempool state.
mempool.UpdateTransactionsFromBlock(vHashUpdate);
}
// Update chainActive and related variables.
@ -2007,7 +2058,7 @@ public: @@ -2007,7 +2058,7 @@ public:
*
* The block is added to connectTrace if connection succeeds.
*/
bool static ConnectTip(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CBlockIndex* pindexNew, const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, ConnectTrace& connectTrace)
bool static ConnectTip(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CBlockIndex* pindexNew, const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, ConnectTrace& connectTrace, DisconnectedBlockTransactions &disconnectpool)
{
assert(pindexNew->pprev == chainActive.Tip());
// Read block from disk.
@ -2049,6 +2100,7 @@ bool static ConnectTip(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, @@ -2049,6 +2100,7 @@ bool static ConnectTip(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams,
LogPrint(BCLog::BENCH, " - Writing chainstate: %.2fms [%.2fs]\n", (nTime5 - nTime4) * 0.001, nTimeChainState * 0.000001);
// Remove conflicting transactions from the mempool.;
mempool.removeForBlock(blockConnecting.vtx, pindexNew->nHeight);
disconnectpool.removeForBlock(blockConnecting.vtx);
// Update chainActive & related variables.
UpdateTip(pindexNew, chainparams);
@ -2142,9 +2194,14 @@ static bool ActivateBestChainStep(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& c @@ -2142,9 +2194,14 @@ static bool ActivateBestChainStep(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& c
// Disconnect active blocks which are no longer in the best chain.
bool fBlocksDisconnected = false;
DisconnectedBlockTransactions disconnectpool;
while (chainActive.Tip() && chainActive.Tip() != pindexFork) {
if (!DisconnectTip(state, chainparams))
if (!DisconnectTip(state, chainparams, &disconnectpool)) {
// This is likely a fatal error, but keep the mempool consistent,
// just in case. Only remove from the mempool in this case.
UpdateMempoolForReorg(disconnectpool, false);
return false;
}
fBlocksDisconnected = true;
}
@ -2167,7 +2224,7 @@ static bool ActivateBestChainStep(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& c @@ -2167,7 +2224,7 @@ static bool ActivateBestChainStep(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& c
// Connect new blocks.
BOOST_REVERSE_FOREACH(CBlockIndex *pindexConnect, vpindexToConnect) {
if (!ConnectTip(state, chainparams, pindexConnect, pindexConnect == pindexMostWork ? pblock : std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>(), connectTrace)) {
if (!ConnectTip(state, chainparams, pindexConnect, pindexConnect == pindexMostWork ? pblock : std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>(), connectTrace, disconnectpool)) {
if (state.IsInvalid()) {
// The block violates a consensus rule.
if (!state.CorruptionPossible())
@ -2178,6 +2235,9 @@ static bool ActivateBestChainStep(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& c @@ -2178,6 +2235,9 @@ static bool ActivateBestChainStep(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& c
break;
} else {
// A system error occurred (disk space, database error, ...).
// Make the mempool consistent with the current tip, just in case
// any observers try to use it before shutdown.
UpdateMempoolForReorg(disconnectpool, false);
return false;
}
} else {
@ -2192,8 +2252,9 @@ static bool ActivateBestChainStep(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& c @@ -2192,8 +2252,9 @@ static bool ActivateBestChainStep(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& c
}
if (fBlocksDisconnected) {
mempool.removeForReorg(pcoinsTip, chainActive.Tip()->nHeight + 1, STANDARD_LOCKTIME_VERIFY_FLAGS);
LimitMempoolSize(mempool, GetArg("-maxmempool", DEFAULT_MAX_MEMPOOL_SIZE) * 1000000, GetArg("-mempoolexpiry", DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_EXPIRY) * 60 * 60);
// If any blocks were disconnected, disconnectpool may be non empty. Add
// any disconnected transactions back to the mempool.
UpdateMempoolForReorg(disconnectpool, true);
}
mempool.check(pcoinsTip);
@ -2342,6 +2403,7 @@ bool InvalidateBlock(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, C @@ -2342,6 +2403,7 @@ bool InvalidateBlock(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, C
setDirtyBlockIndex.insert(pindex);
setBlockIndexCandidates.erase(pindex);
DisconnectedBlockTransactions disconnectpool;
while (chainActive.Contains(pindex)) {
CBlockIndex *pindexWalk = chainActive.Tip();
pindexWalk->nStatus |= BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD;
@ -2349,13 +2411,17 @@ bool InvalidateBlock(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, C @@ -2349,13 +2411,17 @@ bool InvalidateBlock(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, C
setBlockIndexCandidates.erase(pindexWalk);
// ActivateBestChain considers blocks already in chainActive
// unconditionally valid already, so force disconnect away from it.
if (!DisconnectTip(state, chainparams)) {
mempool.removeForReorg(pcoinsTip, chainActive.Tip()->nHeight + 1, STANDARD_LOCKTIME_VERIFY_FLAGS);
if (!DisconnectTip(state, chainparams, &disconnectpool)) {
// It's probably hopeless to try to make the mempool consistent
// here if DisconnectTip failed, but we can try.
UpdateMempoolForReorg(disconnectpool, false);
return false;
}
}
LimitMempoolSize(mempool, GetArg("-maxmempool", DEFAULT_MAX_MEMPOOL_SIZE) * 1000000, GetArg("-mempoolexpiry", DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_EXPIRY) * 60 * 60);
// DisconnectTip will add transactions to disconnectpool; try to add these
// back to the mempool.
UpdateMempoolForReorg(disconnectpool, true);
// The resulting new best tip may not be in setBlockIndexCandidates anymore, so
// add it again.
@ -2368,7 +2434,6 @@ bool InvalidateBlock(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, C @@ -2368,7 +2434,6 @@ bool InvalidateBlock(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, C
}
InvalidChainFound(pindex);
mempool.removeForReorg(pcoinsTip, chainActive.Tip()->nHeight + 1, STANDARD_LOCKTIME_VERIFY_FLAGS);
uiInterface.NotifyBlockTip(IsInitialBlockDownload(), pindex->pprev);
return true;
}
@ -3482,7 +3547,7 @@ bool RewindBlockIndex(const CChainParams& params) @@ -3482,7 +3547,7 @@ bool RewindBlockIndex(const CChainParams& params)
// of the blockchain).
break;
}
if (!DisconnectTip(state, params, true)) {
if (!DisconnectTip(state, params, NULL)) {
return error("RewindBlockIndex: unable to disconnect block at height %i", pindex->nHeight);
}
// Occasionally flush state to disk.

2
src/validation.h

@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ static const unsigned int DEFAULT_DESCENDANT_LIMIT = 25; @@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ static const unsigned int DEFAULT_DESCENDANT_LIMIT = 25;
static const unsigned int DEFAULT_DESCENDANT_SIZE_LIMIT = 101;
/** Default for -mempoolexpiry, expiration time for mempool transactions in hours */
static const unsigned int DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_EXPIRY = 336;
/** Maximum kilobytes for transactions to store for processing during reorg */
static const unsigned int MAX_DISCONNECTED_TX_POOL_SIZE = 20000;
/** The maximum size of a blk?????.dat file (since 0.8) */
static const unsigned int MAX_BLOCKFILE_SIZE = 0x8000000; // 128 MiB
/** The pre-allocation chunk size for blk?????.dat files (since 0.8) */

15
test/functional/pruning.py

@ -34,10 +34,11 @@ class PruneTest(BitcoinTestFramework): @@ -34,10 +34,11 @@ class PruneTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
# Create nodes 0 and 1 to mine.
# Create node 2 to test pruning.
self.full_node_default_args = ["-maxreceivebuffer=20000","-blockmaxsize=999000", "-checkblocks=5", "-limitdescendantcount=100", "-limitdescendantsize=5000", "-limitancestorcount=100", "-limitancestorsize=5000" ]
# Create nodes 3 and 4 to test manual pruning (they will be re-started with manual pruning later)
# Create nodes 5 to test wallet in prune mode, but do not connect
self.extra_args = [["-maxreceivebuffer=20000", "-blockmaxsize=999000", "-checkblocks=5"],
["-maxreceivebuffer=20000", "-blockmaxsize=999000", "-checkblocks=5"],
self.extra_args = [self.full_node_default_args,
self.full_node_default_args,
["-maxreceivebuffer=20000", "-prune=550"],
["-maxreceivebuffer=20000", "-blockmaxsize=999000"],
["-maxreceivebuffer=20000", "-blockmaxsize=999000"],
@ -97,12 +98,15 @@ class PruneTest(BitcoinTestFramework): @@ -97,12 +98,15 @@ class PruneTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
# Node 2 stays connected, so it hears about the stale blocks and then reorg's when node0 reconnects
# Stopping node 0 also clears its mempool, so it doesn't have node1's transactions to accidentally mine
self.stop_node(0)
self.nodes[0]=start_node(0, self.options.tmpdir, ["-maxreceivebuffer=20000","-blockmaxsize=999000", "-checkblocks=5"], timewait=900)
self.nodes[0]=start_node(0, self.options.tmpdir, self.full_node_default_args, timewait=900)
# Mine 24 blocks in node 1
for i in range(24):
if j == 0:
mine_large_block(self.nodes[1], self.utxo_cache_1)
else:
# Add node1's wallet transactions back to the mempool, to
# avoid the mined blocks from being too small.
self.nodes[1].resendwallettransactions()
self.nodes[1].generate(1) #tx's already in mempool from previous disconnects
# Reorg back with 25 block chain from node 0
@ -159,6 +163,11 @@ class PruneTest(BitcoinTestFramework): @@ -159,6 +163,11 @@ class PruneTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
self.log.info("Usage possibly still high bc of stale blocks in block files: %d" % calc_usage(self.prunedir))
self.log.info("Mine 220 more blocks so we have requisite history (some blocks will be big and cause pruning of previous chain)")
# Get node0's wallet transactions back in its mempool, to avoid the
# mined blocks from being too small.
self.nodes[0].resendwallettransactions()
for i in range(22):
# This can be slow, so do this in multiple RPC calls to avoid
# RPC timeouts.

Loading…
Cancel
Save