|
|
|
@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ namespace {
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ namespace {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Forward reference functions defined here:
|
|
|
|
|
static const unsigned int MAX_DOUBLESPEND_BLOOM = 1000; |
|
|
|
|
static void RelayDoubleSpend(const COutPoint& outPoint, const CTransaction& doubleSpend, bool fInBlock, CBloomFilter& filter); |
|
|
|
|
static bool RelayableRespend(const COutPoint& outPoint, const CTransaction& doubleSpend, bool fInBlock, CBloomFilter& filter); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ struct CMainSignals {
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ struct CMainSignals {
|
|
|
|
|
// transaction was first seen in a block.
|
|
|
|
|
// Note: only notifies if the previous transaction is in the memory pool; if previous transction was in a block,
|
|
|
|
|
// then the double-spend simply fails when we try to lookup the inputs in the current UTXO set.
|
|
|
|
|
boost::signals2::signal<void (const COutPoint&, const CTransaction&, bool)> DetectedDoubleSpend; |
|
|
|
|
boost::signals2::signal<bool (const COutPoint&, const CTransaction&, bool)> DetectedDoubleSpend; |
|
|
|
|
} g_signals; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} // anon namespace
|
|
|
|
@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ void RegisterInternalSignals() {
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ void RegisterInternalSignals() {
|
|
|
|
|
seed_insecure_rand(); |
|
|
|
|
doubleSpendFilter = CBloomFilter(MAX_DOUBLESPEND_BLOOM, 0.01, insecure_rand(), BLOOM_UPDATE_NONE); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_signals.DetectedDoubleSpend.connect(boost::bind(RelayDoubleSpend, _1, _2, _3, doubleSpendFilter)); |
|
|
|
|
g_signals.DetectedDoubleSpend.connect(boost::bind(RelayableRespend, _1, _2, _3, doubleSpendFilter)); |
|
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -936,6 +936,7 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPool(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState &state, const CTransa
@@ -936,6 +936,7 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPool(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState &state, const CTransa
|
|
|
|
|
return false; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check for conflicts with in-memory transactions
|
|
|
|
|
bool relayableRespend = false; |
|
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
|
LOCK(pool.cs); // protect pool.mapNextTx
|
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < tx.vin.size(); i++) |
|
|
|
@ -944,8 +945,9 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPool(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState &state, const CTransa
@@ -944,8 +945,9 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPool(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState &state, const CTransa
|
|
|
|
|
// Does tx conflict with a member of the pool, and is it not equivalent to that member?
|
|
|
|
|
if (pool.mapNextTx.count(outpoint) && !tx.IsEquivalentTo(*pool.mapNextTx[outpoint].ptx)) |
|
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
|
g_signals.DetectedDoubleSpend(outpoint, tx, false); |
|
|
|
|
return false; |
|
|
|
|
relayableRespend = g_signals.DetectedDoubleSpend(outpoint, tx, false); |
|
|
|
|
if (!relayableRespend) |
|
|
|
|
return false; |
|
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
@ -1038,16 +1040,24 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPool(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState &state, const CTransa
@@ -1038,16 +1040,24 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPool(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState &state, const CTransa
|
|
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
|
return error("AcceptToMemoryPool: : ConnectInputs failed %s", hash.ToString()); |
|
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
// Store transaction in memory
|
|
|
|
|
pool.addUnchecked(hash, entry); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (relayableRespend) |
|
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
|
RelayTransaction(tx); |
|
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
else |
|
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
|
// Store transaction in memory
|
|
|
|
|
pool.addUnchecked(hash, entry); |
|
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_signals.SyncTransaction(tx, NULL); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return true; |
|
|
|
|
return !relayableRespend; |
|
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void RelayDoubleSpend(const COutPoint& outPoint, const CTransaction& doubleSpend, bool fInBlock, CBloomFilter& filter) |
|
|
|
|
static bool RelayableRespend(const COutPoint& outPoint, const CTransaction& doubleSpend, bool fInBlock, CBloomFilter& filter) |
|
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
|
// Relaying double-spend attempts to our peers lets them detect when
|
|
|
|
|
// somebody might be trying to cheat them. However, blindly relaying
|
|
|
|
@ -1060,7 +1070,7 @@ static void RelayDoubleSpend(const COutPoint& outPoint, const CTransaction& doub
@@ -1060,7 +1070,7 @@ static void RelayDoubleSpend(const COutPoint& outPoint, const CTransaction& doub
|
|
|
|
|
// from us they are very likely to hear about it from another peer, since
|
|
|
|
|
// each peer uses a different, randomized bloom filter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (fInBlock || filter.contains(outPoint)) return; |
|
|
|
|
if (fInBlock || filter.contains(outPoint)) return false; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Apply an independent rate limit to double-spend relays
|
|
|
|
|
static double dRespendCount; |
|
|
|
@ -1071,7 +1081,7 @@ static void RelayDoubleSpend(const COutPoint& outPoint, const CTransaction& doub
@@ -1071,7 +1081,7 @@ static void RelayDoubleSpend(const COutPoint& outPoint, const CTransaction& doub
|
|
|
|
|
if (RateLimitExceeded(dRespendCount, nLastRespendTime, nRespendLimit, nSize)) |
|
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
|
LogPrint("mempool", "Double-spend relay rejected by rate limiter\n"); |
|
|
|
|
return; |
|
|
|
|
return false; |
|
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LogPrint("mempool", "Rate limit dRespendCount: %g => %g\n", dRespendCount, dRespendCount+nSize); |
|
|
|
@ -1083,10 +1093,7 @@ static void RelayDoubleSpend(const COutPoint& outPoint, const CTransaction& doub
@@ -1083,10 +1093,7 @@ static void RelayDoubleSpend(const COutPoint& outPoint, const CTransaction& doub
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
filter.insert(outPoint); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RelayTransaction(doubleSpend); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Share conflict with wallet
|
|
|
|
|
g_signals.SyncTransaction(doubleSpend, NULL); |
|
|
|
|
return true; |
|
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|