Browse Source

Merge #7935: Versionbits: GBT support

12c708a getblocktemplate: Use version/force mutation to support pre-BIP9 clients (Luke Dashjr)
9879060 getblocktemplate: Explicitly handle the distinction between GBT-affecting softforks vs not (Luke Dashjr)
72cd6b2 qa/rpc-tests: bip9-softforks: Add tests for getblocktemplate versionbits updates (Luke Dashjr)
d3df40e Implement BIP 9 GBT changes (Luke Dashjr)
0.13
Pieter Wuille 8 years ago
parent
commit
66ed450d77
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: DBA1A67379A1A931
  1. 32
      qa/rpc-tests/bip9-softforks.py
  2. 1
      src/consensus/params.h
  3. 2
      src/main.cpp
  4. 2
      src/main.h
  5. 105
      src/rpc/mining.cpp
  6. 13
      src/versionbits.cpp
  7. 9
      src/versionbits.h

32
qa/rpc-tests/bip9-softforks.py

@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ class BIP9SoftForksTest(ComparisonTestFramework): @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ class BIP9SoftForksTest(ComparisonTestFramework):
info = self.nodes[0].getblockchaininfo()
return info['bip9_softforks'][key]
def test_BIP(self, bipName, activated_version, invalidate, invalidatePostSignature):
def test_BIP(self, bipName, activated_version, invalidate, invalidatePostSignature, bitno):
# generate some coins for later
self.coinbase_blocks = self.nodes[0].generate(2)
self.height = 3 # height of the next block to build
@ -89,6 +89,11 @@ class BIP9SoftForksTest(ComparisonTestFramework): @@ -89,6 +89,11 @@ class BIP9SoftForksTest(ComparisonTestFramework):
self.last_block_time = int(time.time())
assert_equal(self.get_bip9_status(bipName)['status'], 'defined')
tmpl = self.nodes[0].getblocktemplate({})
assert(bipName not in tmpl['rules'])
assert(bipName not in tmpl['vbavailable'])
assert_equal(tmpl['vbrequired'], 0)
assert_equal(tmpl['version'], 0x20000000)
# Test 1
# Advance from DEFINED to STARTED
@ -96,6 +101,11 @@ class BIP9SoftForksTest(ComparisonTestFramework): @@ -96,6 +101,11 @@ class BIP9SoftForksTest(ComparisonTestFramework):
yield TestInstance(test_blocks, sync_every_block=False)
assert_equal(self.get_bip9_status(bipName)['status'], 'started')
tmpl = self.nodes[0].getblocktemplate({})
assert(bipName not in tmpl['rules'])
assert_equal(tmpl['vbavailable'][bipName], bitno)
assert_equal(tmpl['vbrequired'], 0)
assert(tmpl['version'] & activated_version)
# Test 2
# Fail to achieve LOCKED_IN 100 out of 144 signal bit 1
@ -107,6 +117,11 @@ class BIP9SoftForksTest(ComparisonTestFramework): @@ -107,6 +117,11 @@ class BIP9SoftForksTest(ComparisonTestFramework):
yield TestInstance(test_blocks, sync_every_block=False)
assert_equal(self.get_bip9_status(bipName)['status'], 'started')
tmpl = self.nodes[0].getblocktemplate({})
assert(bipName not in tmpl['rules'])
assert_equal(tmpl['vbavailable'][bipName], bitno)
assert_equal(tmpl['vbrequired'], 0)
assert(tmpl['version'] & activated_version)
# Test 3
# 108 out of 144 signal bit 1 to achieve LOCKED_IN
@ -118,6 +133,8 @@ class BIP9SoftForksTest(ComparisonTestFramework): @@ -118,6 +133,8 @@ class BIP9SoftForksTest(ComparisonTestFramework):
yield TestInstance(test_blocks, sync_every_block=False)
assert_equal(self.get_bip9_status(bipName)['status'], 'locked_in')
tmpl = self.nodes[0].getblocktemplate({})
assert(bipName not in tmpl['rules'])
# Test 4
# 143 more version 536870913 blocks (waiting period-1)
@ -125,6 +142,8 @@ class BIP9SoftForksTest(ComparisonTestFramework): @@ -125,6 +142,8 @@ class BIP9SoftForksTest(ComparisonTestFramework):
yield TestInstance(test_blocks, sync_every_block=False)
assert_equal(self.get_bip9_status(bipName)['status'], 'locked_in')
tmpl = self.nodes[0].getblocktemplate({})
assert(bipName not in tmpl['rules'])
# Test 5
# Check that the new rule is enforced
@ -148,6 +167,11 @@ class BIP9SoftForksTest(ComparisonTestFramework): @@ -148,6 +167,11 @@ class BIP9SoftForksTest(ComparisonTestFramework):
yield TestInstance([[block, True]])
assert_equal(self.get_bip9_status(bipName)['status'], 'active')
tmpl = self.nodes[0].getblocktemplate({})
assert(bipName in tmpl['rules'])
assert(bipName not in tmpl['vbavailable'])
assert_equal(tmpl['vbrequired'], 0)
assert(not (tmpl['version'] & (1 << bitno)))
# Test 6
# Check that the new sequence lock rules are enforced
@ -183,9 +207,9 @@ class BIP9SoftForksTest(ComparisonTestFramework): @@ -183,9 +207,9 @@ class BIP9SoftForksTest(ComparisonTestFramework):
def get_tests(self):
for test in itertools.chain(
self.test_BIP('csv', 536870913, self.sequence_lock_invalidate, self.donothing),
self.test_BIP('csv', 536870913, self.mtp_invalidate, self.donothing),
self.test_BIP('csv', 536870913, self.donothing, self.csv_invalidate)
self.test_BIP('csv', 0x20000001, self.sequence_lock_invalidate, self.donothing, 0),
self.test_BIP('csv', 0x20000001, self.mtp_invalidate, self.donothing, 0),
self.test_BIP('csv', 0x20000001, self.donothing, self.csv_invalidate, 0)
):
yield test

1
src/consensus/params.h

@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ enum DeploymentPos @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ enum DeploymentPos
{
DEPLOYMENT_TESTDUMMY,
DEPLOYMENT_CSV, // Deployment of BIP68, BIP112, and BIP113.
// NOTE: Also add new deployments to VersionBitsDeploymentInfo in versionbits.cpp
MAX_VERSION_BITS_DEPLOYMENTS
};

2
src/main.cpp

@ -2181,7 +2181,7 @@ void PartitionCheck(bool (*initialDownloadCheck)(), CCriticalSection& cs, const @@ -2181,7 +2181,7 @@ void PartitionCheck(bool (*initialDownloadCheck)(), CCriticalSection& cs, const
}
// Protected by cs_main
static VersionBitsCache versionbitscache;
VersionBitsCache versionbitscache;
int32_t ComputeBlockVersion(const CBlockIndex* pindexPrev, const Consensus::Params& params)
{

2
src/main.h

@ -482,6 +482,8 @@ extern CBlockTreeDB *pblocktree; @@ -482,6 +482,8 @@ extern CBlockTreeDB *pblocktree;
*/
int GetSpendHeight(const CCoinsViewCache& inputs);
extern VersionBitsCache versionbitscache;
/**
* Determine what nVersion a new block should use.
*/

105
src/rpc/mining.cpp

@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include "chain.h"
#include "chainparams.h"
#include "consensus/consensus.h"
#include "consensus/params.h"
#include "consensus/validation.h"
#include "core_io.h"
#include "init.h"
@ -303,6 +304,15 @@ static UniValue BIP22ValidationResult(const CValidationState& state) @@ -303,6 +304,15 @@ static UniValue BIP22ValidationResult(const CValidationState& state)
return "valid?";
}
std::string gbt_vb_name(const Consensus::DeploymentPos pos) {
const struct BIP9DeploymentInfo& vbinfo = VersionBitsDeploymentInfo[pos];
std::string s = vbinfo.name;
if (!vbinfo.gbt_force) {
s.insert(s.begin(), '!');
}
return s;
}
UniValue getblocktemplate(const UniValue& params, bool fHelp)
{
if (fHelp || params.size() > 1)
@ -310,7 +320,9 @@ UniValue getblocktemplate(const UniValue& params, bool fHelp) @@ -310,7 +320,9 @@ UniValue getblocktemplate(const UniValue& params, bool fHelp)
"getblocktemplate ( \"jsonrequestobject\" )\n"
"\nIf the request parameters include a 'mode' key, that is used to explicitly select between the default 'template' request or a 'proposal'.\n"
"It returns data needed to construct a block to work on.\n"
"See https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0022 for full specification.\n"
"For full specification, see BIPs 22 and 9:\n"
" https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0022.mediawiki\n"
" https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0009.mediawiki#getblocktemplate_changes\n"
"\nArguments:\n"
"1. \"jsonrequestobject\" (string, optional) A json object in the following spec\n"
@ -326,6 +338,12 @@ UniValue getblocktemplate(const UniValue& params, bool fHelp) @@ -326,6 +338,12 @@ UniValue getblocktemplate(const UniValue& params, bool fHelp)
"\nResult:\n"
"{\n"
" \"version\" : n, (numeric) The block version\n"
" \"rules\" : [ \"rulename\", ... ], (array of strings) specific block rules that are to be enforced\n"
" \"vbavailable\" : { (json object) set of pending, supported versionbit (BIP 9) softfork deployments\n"
" \"rulename\" : bitnumber (numeric) identifies the bit number as indicating acceptance and readiness for the named softfork rule\n"
" ,...\n"
" },\n"
" \"vbrequired\" : n, (numeric) bit mask of versionbits the server requires set in submissions\n"
" \"previousblockhash\" : \"xxxx\", (string) The hash of current highest block\n"
" \"transactions\" : [ (array) contents of non-coinbase transactions that should be included in the next block\n"
" {\n"
@ -369,6 +387,8 @@ UniValue getblocktemplate(const UniValue& params, bool fHelp) @@ -369,6 +387,8 @@ UniValue getblocktemplate(const UniValue& params, bool fHelp)
std::string strMode = "template";
UniValue lpval = NullUniValue;
std::set<std::string> setClientRules;
int64_t nMaxVersionPreVB = -1;
if (params.size() > 0)
{
const UniValue& oparam = params[0].get_obj();
@ -412,6 +432,20 @@ UniValue getblocktemplate(const UniValue& params, bool fHelp) @@ -412,6 +432,20 @@ UniValue getblocktemplate(const UniValue& params, bool fHelp)
TestBlockValidity(state, Params(), block, pindexPrev, false, true);
return BIP22ValidationResult(state);
}
const UniValue& aClientRules = find_value(oparam, "rules");
if (aClientRules.isArray()) {
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < aClientRules.size(); ++i) {
const UniValue& v = aClientRules[i];
setClientRules.insert(v.get_str());
}
} else {
// NOTE: It is important that this NOT be read if versionbits is supported
const UniValue& uvMaxVersion = find_value(oparam, "maxversion");
if (uvMaxVersion.isNum()) {
nMaxVersionPreVB = uvMaxVersion.get_int64();
}
}
}
if (strMode != "template")
@ -501,9 +535,10 @@ UniValue getblocktemplate(const UniValue& params, bool fHelp) @@ -501,9 +535,10 @@ UniValue getblocktemplate(const UniValue& params, bool fHelp)
pindexPrev = pindexPrevNew;
}
CBlock* pblock = &pblocktemplate->block; // pointer for convenience
const Consensus::Params& consensusParams = Params().GetConsensus();
// Update nTime
UpdateTime(pblock, Params().GetConsensus(), pindexPrev);
UpdateTime(pblock, consensusParams, pindexPrev);
pblock->nNonce = 0;
UniValue aCaps(UniValue::VARR); aCaps.push_back("proposal");
@ -544,17 +579,69 @@ UniValue getblocktemplate(const UniValue& params, bool fHelp) @@ -544,17 +579,69 @@ UniValue getblocktemplate(const UniValue& params, bool fHelp)
arith_uint256 hashTarget = arith_uint256().SetCompact(pblock->nBits);
static UniValue aMutable(UniValue::VARR);
if (aMutable.empty())
{
aMutable.push_back("time");
aMutable.push_back("transactions");
aMutable.push_back("prevblock");
}
UniValue aMutable(UniValue::VARR);
aMutable.push_back("time");
aMutable.push_back("transactions");
aMutable.push_back("prevblock");
UniValue result(UniValue::VOBJ);
result.push_back(Pair("capabilities", aCaps));
UniValue aRules(UniValue::VARR);
UniValue vbavailable(UniValue::VOBJ);
for (int i = 0; i < (int)Consensus::MAX_VERSION_BITS_DEPLOYMENTS; ++i) {
Consensus::DeploymentPos pos = Consensus::DeploymentPos(i);
ThresholdState state = VersionBitsState(pindexPrev, consensusParams, pos, versionbitscache);
switch (state) {
case THRESHOLD_DEFINED:
case THRESHOLD_FAILED:
// Not exposed to GBT at all
break;
case THRESHOLD_LOCKED_IN:
// Ensure bit is set in block version
pblock->nVersion |= VersionBitsMask(consensusParams, pos);
// FALL THROUGH to get vbavailable set...
case THRESHOLD_STARTED:
{
const struct BIP9DeploymentInfo& vbinfo = VersionBitsDeploymentInfo[pos];
vbavailable.push_back(Pair(gbt_vb_name(pos), consensusParams.vDeployments[pos].bit));
if (setClientRules.find(vbinfo.name) == setClientRules.end()) {
if (!vbinfo.gbt_force) {
// If the client doesn't support this, don't indicate it in the [default] version
pblock->nVersion &= ~VersionBitsMask(consensusParams, pos);
}
}
break;
}
case THRESHOLD_ACTIVE:
{
// Add to rules only
const struct BIP9DeploymentInfo& vbinfo = VersionBitsDeploymentInfo[pos];
aRules.push_back(gbt_vb_name(pos));
if (setClientRules.find(vbinfo.name) == setClientRules.end()) {
// Not supported by the client; make sure it's safe to proceed
if (!vbinfo.gbt_force) {
// If we do anything other than throw an exception here, be sure version/force isn't sent to old clients
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_PARAMETER, strprintf("Support for '%s' rule requires explicit client support", vbinfo.name));
}
}
break;
}
}
}
result.push_back(Pair("version", pblock->nVersion));
result.push_back(Pair("rules", aRules));
result.push_back(Pair("vbavailable", vbavailable));
result.push_back(Pair("vbrequired", int(0)));
if (nMaxVersionPreVB >= 2) {
// If VB is supported by the client, nMaxVersionPreVB is -1, so we won't get here
// Because BIP 34 changed how the generation transaction is serialised, we can only use version/force back to v2 blocks
// This is safe to do [otherwise-]unconditionally only because we are throwing an exception above if a non-force deployment gets activated
// Note that this can probably also be removed entirely after the first BIP9 non-force deployment (ie, probably segwit) gets activated
aMutable.push_back("version/force");
}
result.push_back(Pair("previousblockhash", pblock->hashPrevBlock.GetHex()));
result.push_back(Pair("transactions", transactions));
result.push_back(Pair("coinbaseaux", aux));

13
src/versionbits.cpp

@ -4,6 +4,19 @@ @@ -4,6 +4,19 @@
#include "versionbits.h"
#include "consensus/params.h"
const struct BIP9DeploymentInfo VersionBitsDeploymentInfo[Consensus::MAX_VERSION_BITS_DEPLOYMENTS] = {
{
/*.name =*/ "testdummy",
/*.gbt_force =*/ true,
},
{
/*.name =*/ "csv",
/*.gbt_force =*/ true,
}
};
ThresholdState AbstractThresholdConditionChecker::GetStateFor(const CBlockIndex* pindexPrev, const Consensus::Params& params, ThresholdConditionCache& cache) const
{
int nPeriod = Period(params);

9
src/versionbits.h

@ -30,6 +30,15 @@ enum ThresholdState { @@ -30,6 +30,15 @@ enum ThresholdState {
// will either be NULL or a block with (height + 1) % Period() == 0.
typedef std::map<const CBlockIndex*, ThresholdState> ThresholdConditionCache;
struct BIP9DeploymentInfo {
/** Deployment name */
const char *name;
/** Whether GBT clients can safely ignore this rule in simplified usage */
bool gbt_force;
};
extern const struct BIP9DeploymentInfo VersionBitsDeploymentInfo[];
/**
* Abstract class that implements BIP9-style threshold logic, and caches results.
*/

Loading…
Cancel
Save