Browse Source

locking: fix a few small issues uncovered by -Wthread-safety

- rpcwallet: No need to lock twice here
- openssl: Clang doesn't understand selective lock/unlock here. Ignore it.
- CNode: Fix a legitimate (though very unlikely) locking bug.
0.13
Cory Fields 9 years ago
parent
commit
2b890dd424
  1. 4
      src/net.cpp
  2. 2
      src/util.cpp
  3. 1
      src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp

4
src/net.cpp

@ -2032,8 +2032,10 @@ void CNode::EndMessage() UNLOCK_FUNCTION(cs_vSend) @@ -2032,8 +2032,10 @@ void CNode::EndMessage() UNLOCK_FUNCTION(cs_vSend)
Fuzz(GetArg("-fuzzmessagestest", 10));
if (ssSend.size() == 0)
{
LEAVE_CRITICAL_SECTION(cs_vSend);
return;
}
// Set the size
unsigned int nSize = ssSend.size() - CMessageHeader::HEADER_SIZE;
WriteLE32((uint8_t*)&ssSend[CMessageHeader::MESSAGE_SIZE_OFFSET], nSize);

2
src/util.cpp

@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ CTranslationInterface translationInterface; @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ CTranslationInterface translationInterface;
/** Init OpenSSL library multithreading support */
static CCriticalSection** ppmutexOpenSSL;
void locking_callback(int mode, int i, const char* file, int line)
void locking_callback(int mode, int i, const char* file, int line) NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS
{
if (mode & CRYPTO_LOCK) {
ENTER_CRITICAL_SECTION(*ppmutexOpenSSL[i]);

1
src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp

@ -476,7 +476,6 @@ UniValue listaddressgroupings(const UniValue& params, bool fHelp) @@ -476,7 +476,6 @@ UniValue listaddressgroupings(const UniValue& params, bool fHelp)
addressInfo.push_back(CBitcoinAddress(address).ToString());
addressInfo.push_back(ValueFromAmount(balances[address]));
{
LOCK(pwalletMain->cs_wallet);
if (pwalletMain->mapAddressBook.find(CBitcoinAddress(address).Get()) != pwalletMain->mapAddressBook.end())
addressInfo.push_back(pwalletMain->mapAddressBook.find(CBitcoinAddress(address).Get())->second.name);
}

Loading…
Cancel
Save