Browse Source

torcontrol: Add unit tests for Tor reply parsers

0.15
Jack Grigg 8 years ago
parent
commit
29f3c20078
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 665DBCD284F7DAFF
  1. 1
      src/Makefile.test.include
  2. 168
      src/test/torcontrol_tests.cpp

1
src/Makefile.test.include

@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ BITCOIN_TESTS =\
test/testutil.cpp \ test/testutil.cpp \
test/testutil.h \ test/testutil.h \
test/timedata_tests.cpp \ test/timedata_tests.cpp \
test/torcontrol_tests.cpp \
test/transaction_tests.cpp \ test/transaction_tests.cpp \
test/txvalidationcache_tests.cpp \ test/txvalidationcache_tests.cpp \
test/versionbits_tests.cpp \ test/versionbits_tests.cpp \

168
src/test/torcontrol_tests.cpp

@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
// Copyright (c) 2017 The Zcash developers
// Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
// file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
//
#include "test/test_bitcoin.h"
#include "torcontrol.cpp"
#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>
BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(torcontrol_tests, BasicTestingSetup)
void CheckSplitTorReplyLine(std::string input, std::string command, std::string args)
{
BOOST_TEST_MESSAGE(std::string("CheckSplitTorReplyLine(") + input + ")");
auto ret = SplitTorReplyLine(input);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret.first, command);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret.second, args);
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(util_SplitTorReplyLine)
{
// Data we should receive during normal usage
CheckSplitTorReplyLine(
"PROTOCOLINFO PIVERSION",
"PROTOCOLINFO", "PIVERSION");
CheckSplitTorReplyLine(
"AUTH METHODS=COOKIE,SAFECOOKIE COOKIEFILE=\"/home/x/.tor/control_auth_cookie\"",
"AUTH", "METHODS=COOKIE,SAFECOOKIE COOKIEFILE=\"/home/x/.tor/control_auth_cookie\"");
CheckSplitTorReplyLine(
"AUTH METHODS=NULL",
"AUTH", "METHODS=NULL");
CheckSplitTorReplyLine(
"AUTH METHODS=HASHEDPASSWORD",
"AUTH", "METHODS=HASHEDPASSWORD");
CheckSplitTorReplyLine(
"VERSION Tor=\"0.2.9.8 (git-a0df013ea241b026)\"",
"VERSION", "Tor=\"0.2.9.8 (git-a0df013ea241b026)\"");
CheckSplitTorReplyLine(
"AUTHCHALLENGE SERVERHASH=aaaa SERVERNONCE=bbbb",
"AUTHCHALLENGE", "SERVERHASH=aaaa SERVERNONCE=bbbb");
// Other valid inputs
CheckSplitTorReplyLine("COMMAND", "COMMAND", "");
CheckSplitTorReplyLine("COMMAND SOME ARGS", "COMMAND", "SOME ARGS");
// These inputs are valid because PROTOCOLINFO accepts an OtherLine that is
// just an OptArguments, which enables multiple spaces to be present
// between the command and arguments.
CheckSplitTorReplyLine("COMMAND ARGS", "COMMAND", " ARGS");
CheckSplitTorReplyLine("COMMAND EVEN+more ARGS", "COMMAND", " EVEN+more ARGS");
}
void CheckParseTorReplyMapping(std::string input, std::map<std::string,std::string> expected)
{
BOOST_TEST_MESSAGE(std::string("CheckParseTorReplyMapping(") + input + ")");
auto ret = ParseTorReplyMapping(input);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret.size(), expected.size());
auto r_it = ret.begin();
auto e_it = expected.begin();
while (r_it != ret.end() && e_it != expected.end()) {
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(r_it->first, e_it->first);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(r_it->second, e_it->second);
r_it++;
e_it++;
}
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(util_ParseTorReplyMapping)
{
// Data we should receive during normal usage
CheckParseTorReplyMapping(
"METHODS=COOKIE,SAFECOOKIE COOKIEFILE=\"/home/x/.tor/control_auth_cookie\"", {
{"METHODS", "COOKIE,SAFECOOKIE"},
{"COOKIEFILE", "/home/x/.tor/control_auth_cookie"},
});
CheckParseTorReplyMapping(
"METHODS=NULL", {
{"METHODS", "NULL"},
});
CheckParseTorReplyMapping(
"METHODS=HASHEDPASSWORD", {
{"METHODS", "HASHEDPASSWORD"},
});
CheckParseTorReplyMapping(
"Tor=\"0.2.9.8 (git-a0df013ea241b026)\"", {
{"Tor", "0.2.9.8 (git-a0df013ea241b026)"},
});
CheckParseTorReplyMapping(
"SERVERHASH=aaaa SERVERNONCE=bbbb", {
{"SERVERHASH", "aaaa"},
{"SERVERNONCE", "bbbb"},
});
CheckParseTorReplyMapping(
"ServiceID=exampleonion1234", {
{"ServiceID", "exampleonion1234"},
});
CheckParseTorReplyMapping(
"PrivateKey=RSA1024:BLOB", {
{"PrivateKey", "RSA1024:BLOB"},
});
CheckParseTorReplyMapping(
"ClientAuth=bob:BLOB", {
{"ClientAuth", "bob:BLOB"},
});
// Other valid inputs
CheckParseTorReplyMapping(
"Foo=Bar=Baz Spam=Eggs", {
{"Foo", "Bar=Baz"},
{"Spam", "Eggs"},
});
CheckParseTorReplyMapping(
"Foo=\"Bar=Baz\"", {
{"Foo", "Bar=Baz"},
});
CheckParseTorReplyMapping(
"Foo=\"Bar Baz\"", {
{"Foo", "Bar Baz"},
});
// Escapes (which are left escaped by the parser)
CheckParseTorReplyMapping(
"Foo=\"Bar\\ Baz\"", {
{"Foo", "Bar\\ Baz"},
});
CheckParseTorReplyMapping(
"Foo=\"Bar\\Baz\"", {
{"Foo", "Bar\\Baz"},
});
CheckParseTorReplyMapping(
"Foo=\"Bar\\@Baz\"", {
{"Foo", "Bar\\@Baz"},
});
CheckParseTorReplyMapping(
"Foo=\"Bar\\\"Baz\" Spam=\"\\\"Eggs\\\"\"", {
{"Foo", "Bar\\\"Baz"},
{"Spam", "\\\"Eggs\\\""},
});
CheckParseTorReplyMapping(
"Foo=\"Bar\\\\Baz\"", {
{"Foo", "Bar\\\\Baz"},
});
// A more complex valid grammar. PROTOCOLINFO accepts a VersionLine that
// takes a key=value pair followed by an OptArguments, making this valid.
// Because an OptArguments contains no semantic data, there is no point in
// parsing it.
CheckParseTorReplyMapping(
"SOME=args,here MORE optional=arguments here", {
{"SOME", "args,here"},
});
// Inputs that are effectively invalid under the target grammar.
// PROTOCOLINFO accepts an OtherLine that is just an OptArguments, which
// would make these inputs valid. However,
// - This parser is never used in that situation, because the
// SplitTorReplyLine parser enables OtherLine to be skipped.
// - Even if these were valid, an OptArguments contains no semantic data,
// so there is no point in parsing it.
CheckParseTorReplyMapping("ARGS", {});
CheckParseTorReplyMapping("MORE ARGS", {});
CheckParseTorReplyMapping("MORE ARGS", {});
CheckParseTorReplyMapping("EVEN more=ARGS", {});
CheckParseTorReplyMapping("EVEN+more ARGS", {});
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()
Loading…
Cancel
Save