Browse Source

Get rid of DetectShutdownThread

The main thread spends time waiting for the DetectShutdownThread.
So why not just run this waiting loop function in the main thread?

One thread-stack less saves 4MB of virtual memory on 32-bit, and 8MB on
64-bit.
0.13
Wladimir J. van der Laan 10 years ago
parent
commit
28ee7e8b8c
  1. 16
      src/bitcoind.cpp

16
src/bitcoind.cpp

@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
static bool fDaemon;
void DetectShutdownThread(boost::thread_group* threadGroup)
void WaitForShutdown(boost::thread_group* threadGroup)
{
bool fShutdown = ShutdownRequested();
// Tell the main threads to shutdown.
@ -56,7 +56,6 @@ void DetectShutdownThread(boost::thread_group* threadGroup) @@ -56,7 +56,6 @@ void DetectShutdownThread(boost::thread_group* threadGroup)
bool AppInit(int argc, char* argv[])
{
boost::thread_group threadGroup;
boost::thread* detectShutdownThread = NULL;
bool fRet = false;
@ -144,7 +143,6 @@ bool AppInit(int argc, char* argv[]) @@ -144,7 +143,6 @@ bool AppInit(int argc, char* argv[])
#endif
SoftSetBoolArg("-server", true);
detectShutdownThread = new boost::thread(boost::bind(&DetectShutdownThread, &threadGroup));
fRet = AppInit2(threadGroup);
}
catch (const std::exception& e) {
@ -155,20 +153,12 @@ bool AppInit(int argc, char* argv[]) @@ -155,20 +153,12 @@ bool AppInit(int argc, char* argv[])
if (!fRet)
{
if (detectShutdownThread)
detectShutdownThread->interrupt();
threadGroup.interrupt_all();
// threadGroup.join_all(); was left out intentionally here, because we didn't re-test all of
// the startup-failure cases to make sure they don't result in a hang due to some
// thread-blocking-waiting-for-another-thread-during-startup case
}
if (detectShutdownThread)
{
detectShutdownThread->join();
delete detectShutdownThread;
detectShutdownThread = NULL;
} else {
WaitForShutdown(&threadGroup);
}
Shutdown();

Loading…
Cancel
Save