Browse Source
0.13517e6dd
Unit test doublespends in new blocks (Gavin Andresen)17b1142
Cache transaction validation successes (Pieter Wuille)
Wladimir J. van der Laan
10 years ago
8 changed files with 330 additions and 6 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
|
||||
// Copyright (c) 2011-2014 The Bitcoin Core developers
|
||||
// Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
|
||||
// file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
|
||||
|
||||
#include "consensus/validation.h" |
||||
#include "key.h" |
||||
#include "main.h" |
||||
#include "miner.h" |
||||
#include "pubkey.h" |
||||
#include "txmempool.h" |
||||
#include "random.h" |
||||
#include "script/standard.h" |
||||
#include "test/test_bitcoin.h" |
||||
#include "utiltime.h" |
||||
|
||||
#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp> |
||||
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE(tx_validationcache_tests) |
||||
|
||||
static bool |
||||
ToMemPool(CMutableTransaction& tx) |
||||
{ |
||||
LOCK(cs_main); |
||||
|
||||
CValidationState state; |
||||
return AcceptToMemoryPool(mempool, state, tx, false, NULL, false); |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(tx_mempool_block_doublespend, TestChain100Setup) |
||||
{ |
||||
// Make sure skipping validation of transctions that were
|
||||
// validated going into the memory pool does not allow
|
||||
// double-spends in blocks to pass validation when they should not.
|
||||
|
||||
CScript scriptPubKey = CScript() << ToByteVector(coinbaseKey.GetPubKey()) << OP_CHECKSIG; |
||||
|
||||
// Create a double-spend of mature coinbase txn:
|
||||
std::vector<CMutableTransaction> spends; |
||||
spends.resize(2); |
||||
for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) |
||||
{ |
||||
spends[i].vin.resize(1); |
||||
spends[i].vin[0].prevout.hash = coinbaseTxns[0].GetHash(); |
||||
spends[i].vin[0].prevout.n = 0; |
||||
spends[i].vout.resize(1); |
||||
spends[i].vout[0].nValue = 11*CENT; |
||||
spends[i].vout[0].scriptPubKey = scriptPubKey; |
||||
|
||||
// Sign:
|
||||
std::vector<unsigned char> vchSig; |
||||
uint256 hash = SignatureHash(scriptPubKey, spends[i], 0, SIGHASH_ALL); |
||||
BOOST_CHECK(coinbaseKey.Sign(hash, vchSig)); |
||||
vchSig.push_back((unsigned char)SIGHASH_ALL); |
||||
spends[i].vin[0].scriptSig << vchSig; |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
CBlock block; |
||||
|
||||
// Test 1: block with both of those transactions should be rejected.
|
||||
block = CreateAndProcessBlock(spends, scriptPubKey); |
||||
BOOST_CHECK(chainActive.Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash()); |
||||
|
||||
// Test 2: ... and should be rejected if spend1 is in the memory pool
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(ToMemPool(spends[0])); |
||||
block = CreateAndProcessBlock(spends, scriptPubKey); |
||||
BOOST_CHECK(chainActive.Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash()); |
||||
mempool.clear(); |
||||
|
||||
// Test 3: ... and should be rejected if spend2 is in the memory pool
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(ToMemPool(spends[1])); |
||||
block = CreateAndProcessBlock(spends, scriptPubKey); |
||||
BOOST_CHECK(chainActive.Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash()); |
||||
mempool.clear(); |
||||
|
||||
// Final sanity test: first spend in mempool, second in block, that's OK:
|
||||
std::vector<CMutableTransaction> oneSpend; |
||||
oneSpend.push_back(spends[0]); |
||||
BOOST_CHECK(ToMemPool(spends[1])); |
||||
block = CreateAndProcessBlock(oneSpend, scriptPubKey); |
||||
BOOST_CHECK(chainActive.Tip()->GetBlockHash() == block.GetHash()); |
||||
// spends[1] should have been removed from the mempool when the
|
||||
// block with spends[0] is accepted:
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(mempool.size(), 0); |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END() |
Loading…
Reference in new issue