Browse Source

Replace sleep with syncing using pings

0.13
Suhas Daftuar 10 years ago
parent
commit
04b5d235f1
  1. 34
      qa/rpc-tests/p2p-acceptblock.py

34
qa/rpc-tests/p2p-acceptblock.py

@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ class TestNode(NodeConnCB): @@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ class TestNode(NodeConnCB):
NodeConnCB.__init__(self)
self.create_callback_map()
self.connection = None
self.ping_counter = 1
self.last_pong = msg_pong()
def add_connection(self, conn):
self.connection = conn
@ -87,6 +89,24 @@ class TestNode(NodeConnCB): @@ -87,6 +89,24 @@ class TestNode(NodeConnCB):
def send_message(self, message):
self.connection.send_message(message)
def on_pong(self, conn, message):
self.last_pong = message
# Sync up with the node after delivery of a block
def sync_with_ping(self, timeout=30):
self.connection.send_message(msg_ping(nonce=self.ping_counter))
received_pong = False
sleep_time = 0.05
while not received_pong and timeout > 0:
time.sleep(sleep_time)
timeout -= sleep_time
with mininode_lock:
if self.last_pong.nonce == self.ping_counter:
received_pong = True
self.ping_counter += 1
return received_pong
class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def add_options(self, parser):
parser.add_option("--testbinary", dest="testbinary",
@ -139,7 +159,7 @@ class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework): @@ -139,7 +159,7 @@ class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
test_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h2[0]))
white_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h2[1]))
time.sleep(0.5)
[ x.sync_with_ping() for x in [test_node, white_node] ]
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getblockcount(), 2)
assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getblockcount(), 2)
print "First height 2 block accepted by both nodes"
@ -152,7 +172,7 @@ class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework): @@ -152,7 +172,7 @@ class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
test_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h2f[0]))
white_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h2f[1]))
time.sleep(0.5) # Give time to process the block
[ x.sync_with_ping() for x in [test_node, white_node] ]
for x in self.nodes[0].getchaintips():
if x['hash'] == blocks_h2f[0].hash:
assert_equal(x['status'], "headers-only")
@ -171,7 +191,7 @@ class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework): @@ -171,7 +191,7 @@ class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
test_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h3[0]))
white_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h3[1]))
time.sleep(0.5)
[ x.sync_with_ping() for x in [test_node, white_node] ]
# Since the earlier block was not processed by node0, the new block
# can't be fully validated.
for x in self.nodes[0].getchaintips():
@ -222,7 +242,7 @@ class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework): @@ -222,7 +242,7 @@ class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
white_node.send_message(headers_message) # Send headers leading to tip
white_node.send_message(msg_block(tips[1])) # Now deliver the tip
try:
time.sleep(0.5)
white_node.sync_with_ping()
self.nodes[1].getblock(tips[1].hash)
print "Unrequested block far ahead of tip accepted from whitelisted peer"
except:
@ -238,7 +258,7 @@ class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework): @@ -238,7 +258,7 @@ class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
# the node processes it and incorrectly advances the tip).
# But this would be caught later on, when we verify that an inv triggers
# a getdata request for this block.
time.sleep(1)
test_node.sync_with_ping()
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getblockcount(), 2)
print "Unrequested block that would complete more-work chain was ignored"
@ -250,7 +270,7 @@ class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework): @@ -250,7 +270,7 @@ class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
test_node.last_getdata = None
test_node.send_message(msg_inv([CInv(2, blocks_h3[0].sha256)]))
time.sleep(0.5)
test_node.sync_with_ping()
with mininode_lock:
getdata = test_node.last_getdata
@ -261,7 +281,7 @@ class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework): @@ -261,7 +281,7 @@ class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
# 7. Send the missing block for the third time (now it is requested)
test_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h2f[0]))
time.sleep(2)
test_node.sync_with_ping()
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getblockcount(), 290)
print "Successfully reorged to longer chain from non-whitelisted peer"

Loading…
Cancel
Save