d4708
/
opentracker
mirror of git://erdgeist.org/opentracker
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Browse Source

v6 works since january

dynamic-accesslists
erdgeist 15 years ago
parent
9eb860f041
commit
9be794395f
1 changed files with 1 additions and 8 deletions
Whitespace
Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL
Split View
Diff Options
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File
  1. 9
      README_v6

9
README_v6
Unescape View File

@ -1,8 +1 @@ @@ -1,8 +1 @@
Q: Why is there no v6-support in opentracker?
A: Although I tried very hard, implementing v6 right now would be a terrible waste of bandwidth, there is no compact format for v6 addresses, so instead of
answering "d5:peers6:AAAAPPe" I'd have to send "d5:peersld2:ip39:AAAA:AAAA:AAAA:AAAA:AAAA:AAAA:AAAA:AAAA4:port2:PPPPeee" for a single peer. Even if there was a
compact mode, v6 addresses still would eat up thrice the memory, v4 addresses take. This, however, wouldn't be a show stopper.
Other problems concern efficient peer selection for obviously v6-capable peers and how to select peers for non-v6 clients. v6 addresses eat up more memory on the
host, too ;)
IPv6 is implemented in opentracker now. You can chose whether your tracker runs in v4 or v6 mode in Makefile. YMMV.

Write Preview
Loading…
Cancel
Save