Browse Source

Duplicate the buffer in process_results in bflsc since strtok modifies it making debugging output limited to one line.

nfactor-troky
Con Kolivas 11 years ago
parent
commit
83a8c1328c
  1. 16
      driver-bflsc.c

16
driver-bflsc.c

@ -1298,22 +1298,24 @@ static void process_nonces(struct cgpu_info *bflsc, int dev, char *xlink, char * @@ -1298,22 +1298,24 @@ static void process_nonces(struct cgpu_info *bflsc, int dev, char *xlink, char *
free_work(work);
}
static int process_results(struct cgpu_info *bflsc, int dev, char *buf, int *nonces)
static int process_results(struct cgpu_info *bflsc, int dev, char *pbuf, int *nonces)
{
struct bflsc_info *sc_info = (struct bflsc_info *)(bflsc->device_data);
char **items, *firstname, **fields, *lf;
int que = 0, i, lines, count;
char *tmp, *tmp2, *buf;
char xlink[17];
char *tmp, *tmp2;
bool res;
*nonces = 0;
xlinkstr(xlink, sizeof(xlink), dev, sc_info);
buf = strdup(pbuf);
res = tolines(bflsc, dev, buf, &lines, &items, C_GETRESULTS);
free(buf);
if (!res || lines < 1) {
tmp = str_text(buf);
tmp = str_text(pbuf);
applog(LOG_ERR, "%s%i:%s empty result (%s) ignored",
bflsc->drv->name, bflsc->device_id, xlink, tmp);
free(tmp);
@ -1321,7 +1323,7 @@ static int process_results(struct cgpu_info *bflsc, int dev, char *buf, int *non @@ -1321,7 +1323,7 @@ static int process_results(struct cgpu_info *bflsc, int dev, char *buf, int *non
}
if (lines < QUE_RES_LINES_MIN) {
tmp = str_text(buf);
tmp = str_text(pbuf);
applog(LOG_ERR, "%s%i:%s result too small (%s) ignored",
bflsc->drv->name, bflsc->device_id, xlink, tmp);
free(tmp);
@ -1330,7 +1332,7 @@ static int process_results(struct cgpu_info *bflsc, int dev, char *buf, int *non @@ -1330,7 +1332,7 @@ static int process_results(struct cgpu_info *bflsc, int dev, char *buf, int *non
breakdown(ONECOLON, items[1], &count, &firstname, &fields, &lf);
if (count < 1) {
tmp = str_text(buf);
tmp = str_text(pbuf);
tmp2 = str_text(items[1]);
applog(LOG_ERR, "%s%i:%s empty result count (%s) in (%s) ignoring",
bflsc->drv->name, bflsc->device_id, xlink, tmp2, tmp);
@ -1338,7 +1340,7 @@ static int process_results(struct cgpu_info *bflsc, int dev, char *buf, int *non @@ -1338,7 +1340,7 @@ static int process_results(struct cgpu_info *bflsc, int dev, char *buf, int *non
free(tmp);
goto arigatou;
} else if (count != 1) {
tmp = str_text(buf);
tmp = str_text(pbuf);
tmp2 = str_text(items[1]);
applog(LOG_ERR, "%s%i:%s incorrect result count %d (%s) in (%s) will try anyway",
bflsc->drv->name, bflsc->device_id, xlink, count, tmp2, tmp);
@ -1352,7 +1354,7 @@ static int process_results(struct cgpu_info *bflsc, int dev, char *buf, int *non @@ -1352,7 +1354,7 @@ static int process_results(struct cgpu_info *bflsc, int dev, char *buf, int *non
// 1+ In case the last line isn't 'OK' - try to process it
que = 1 + lines - QUE_RES_LINES_MIN;
tmp = str_text(buf);
tmp = str_text(pbuf);
tmp2 = str_text(items[0]);
applog(LOG_ERR, "%s%i:%s incorrect result count %d (%s) will try %d (%s)",
bflsc->drv->name, bflsc->device_id, xlink, i, tmp2, que, tmp);

Loading…
Cancel
Save