GOSTSec
/
sgminer
mirror of https://github.com/GOSTSec/sgminer
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity
Browse Source

doc: Change answer about scrypt-jane/Keccak/SHA-3 support. 

There seems to be interest by the community (and a development effort), so
if scrypt-jane can be used without introducing switches everywhere, it
could be used.
nfactor-troky
Noel Maersk 11 years ago
parent
ee5995e971
commit
806b23627b
1 changed files with 2 additions and 6 deletions
Whitespace
Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL
Split View
Diff Options
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File
  1. 8
      doc/FAQ.md

8
doc/FAQ.md
Unescape View File

@ -31,12 +31,8 @@ practice to try and support every gadget out there. Developers @@ -31,12 +31,8 @@ practice to try and support every gadget out there. Developers
for dedicated hardware products are better off creating standalone
software.
Q: Will there be Keccak/SHA-3 support?
A: No, for the same reason as above. There is also no reason why this
particular piece of software should support all possible algorithms.
SHA-3 cryptocurrency developers are better off writing independent
implementations. This also has the side-benefits of eliminating codebase
monopoly, and lower maintanance for everybody.
Q: Will there be scrypt-jane/Keccak/SHA-3 support?
A: Perhaps eventually, if it can be implemented without code bloat.
Q: Can you modify the display to include more of one thing in the output
and less of another, or can you change the quiet mode or can you add

Write Preview
Loading…
Cancel
Save